22-09-2019, 10:55 PM
(22-09-2019, 05:21 PM)Morten St. George Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view....
In my last post I noted that a copy of the Sworn Book of Honorius (our guide to decoding the VMS) was inscribed with "Sum Ben: Jonsonij liber".
That should erase all doubt that "liber" rather than "leber" was the intention because, in MSG Theory, the person named in that inscription became a close personal friend of the author of the VMS marginalia.
I see ex libris annotations all the time in manuscripts. I've collected many of them. People write their names in books or they describe where it is from (e.g., a specific monastery). And the word "liber" is in many of those annotations.
But the annotation at the top-left of 116v is NOT an ex libris in any normal sense of the word, so there's no reason to assume that the word must be "liber" just because other books have "ex libris" notations. They also have charms, healing recipes, and incantations, and the text on 116v follows THAT format much more closely than any ex libris notaton I've seen.
A researcher's job is to observe, describe, learn, adjust, and describe some more...
You seem to just assume, assume, assume, assume, and assume (always trying to take shortcuts) without taking the time to acquire enough background about a particular thing to actually describe it accurately or within its proper context.