13-11-2025, 10:53 PM
(13-11-2025, 10:44 PM)oshfdk Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(13-11-2025, 10:09 PM)Doireannjane Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.If you're not going to try to demonstrate repeatability, why are you on this thread?
Good question actually. Mostly because I strongly believe that even the most unrealistic solutions may contain useful insights, when coming from a person that seems to be genuinely interested in the manuscript and has obviously spent considerable time working on it. So, I generally engage with many new solutions, even when I find them completely implausible. Also, you did ask for a review of your approach in your first post. If your only desire in this thread is for people to demonstrate repeatability by blindly applying your method, then there is definitely no need for me to spend more time here.
(13-11-2025, 10:09 PM)Doireannjane Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.All you need is Teanglann
The words you provided are very unrealistic for the most common words in almost any text in any language. The most common words even in a technical or poetic text would be generic words like: and, not, which, that, even, for, this, from, very, often, less, more, each, what, there, get, take, etc. Not "saying", "point", "cloth", etc.
You have shrunk down what I provided above. It is NOT just "says", "point" or "cloth". Each of those have MULTIPLE other meanings that are context dependent (included in all of their definitions). If I open up an IKEA manual would the most common words be the same as a poetic text or technical text? Much of this is instructional. And some words are combined: FROM is the most common word, it's the "a fada" at the end of a word.
