| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Latest Threads |
Repetition of words
Forum: Voynich Talk
Last Post: Grove
7 minutes ago
» Replies: 59
» Views: 11,553
|
My pet theory
Forum: Theories & Solutions
Last Post: JustAnotherTheory
39 minutes ago
» Replies: 0
» Views: 36
|
Trying to identify the in...
Forum: Physical material
Last Post: kckluge
48 minutes ago
» Replies: 0
» Views: 38
|
Huth's reading of f116v: ...
Forum: Marginalia
Last Post: Bernd
59 minutes ago
» Replies: 9
» Views: 216
|
Scoring artefact for 45% ...
Forum: Analysis of the text
Last Post: chrisj
1 hour ago
» Replies: 4
» Views: 285
|
No text, but a visual cod...
Forum: Theories & Solutions
Last Post: Antonio García Jiménez
1 hour ago
» Replies: 1,691
» Views: 1,038,284
|
Water, earth and air
Forum: Voynich Talk
Last Post: R. Sale
6 hours ago
» Replies: 60
» Views: 11,772
|
The claimed Voynich page
Forum: Imagery
Last Post: Fabrizio Salani
Yesterday, 11:54 PM
» Replies: 87
» Views: 13,684
|
The Book Switch Theory
Forum: Theories & Solutions
Last Post: ReneZ
Yesterday, 11:42 PM
» Replies: 136
» Views: 7,009
|
Voynich Zoom CFP
Forum: News
Last Post: proto57
Yesterday, 07:58 PM
» Replies: 39
» Views: 3,363
|
|
|
| Parallels for dress: Gemini MALE |
|
Posted by: Koen G - 21-09-2018, 10:27 AM - Forum: Imagery
- Replies (22)
|
 |
To get a better picture of what we're dealing with, it would be interesting if we could find out the time and place(s) where we can expect the type of dress worn by the Gemini to emerge. Since this is only about the dress, I decided to make a separate thread for man and woman. It doesn't matter who is wearing it: man with woman, man on horse, man in battle... We're interested in the type of dress by itself.
This approach is valid because, as other members on the forum have pointed out, dress evolves separately from other image factors, especially during medieval times.
Now those who have studied medieval wardrobe to some extent can probably say something like "these clothes are typical for much of the 14th-15th century all over Europe", but this broad statement obviously won't help us much. We'll have to dig into the details. What was important enough to include in the drawing? Are there perhaps minor variations in style that could point us to a more specific region or time?
With subjects like these it is difficult to exclude personal impression, so just to help us sift through the available materia I propose to make use of a set of filters wich will allow us to attach a "score" to each individual piece of clothing. It is not the intention to find an image with a 100% score. If our best matches turn out to be only around 50%, that's perfectly fine. Each medieval drawing is unique, so finding a 100% match is not required. We're looking for tendencies.
I propose the following checks for the male clothing, but these should be discussed beforehand. I have doubted to include color, but then decided that it should be included since it might be part of regional or temporal preference, for all we know. And it's only one factor of many.
gemiman.jpg (Size: 53.2 KB / Downloads: 350)
Houppelande:
- Belted
- Length: between knees and ankles (?)
- Lobed bottom (wavy)
- Vertical lines in body (folds, plaits...)
- Neck collar
- Sleeve collars
- Sleeves till wrist
- Sleeves fitting/narrow at wrist
- No overcoat
- Green
Hat:
- Wider than head
- Shaped like flat cylinder
- Nothing on top
- Nothing hanging down
- Green
Boots:
- Separate from hose
- Visible laces
- About ankle height or a bit higher
- Tip relatively rounded
- Same color as hose
This gives 10,5,5 points to check individual pieces of clothing and 20 for an entire ensemble. It's likely that I got some things wrong or missed something important, so the list should be discussed before starting (although it can always be adjusted afterwards if necessary).
|
|
|
| medieval references to roundels |
|
Posted by: Davidsch - 12-09-2018, 01:34 PM - Forum: Astrology & Astronomy
- Replies (2)
|
 |
Following some interesting stuff mentioned in relation to Diebold Lauber ,
I just randomly browsed the Pal Lat 1370 and was wondering how the scribe makes a reference in the text towards the roundels?
Since there is only a small page number, on the right top, I assume that was written later.
take for example
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
If he writes something about the the zodiacs and calculations in relation to the tables and astrological explanation, how would the scribe make a reference to the appropriate drawing?
(extra image: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.)
added: a fun fact in Hongarian one would write for Page 53 -> 53 oldal
|
|
|
| An earlier Marci? |
|
Posted by: -JKP- - 31-08-2018, 11:37 PM - Forum: Provenance & history
- Replies (10)
|
 |
René, is there any information on earlier members of Iohannes Marci's family (father, grandfather, uncles)?
There is a notation top-right (possibly an ex libris) at the end of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.:
![[Image: GeorgiusMarci.png]](https://voynichportal.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/GeorgiusMarci.png)
A[nn]o 1561 Ad 18 octobre
in ?p g? hispurg (hisburg) (might the third character be c-tail?)
R I D G? (N D G?)
Georgius Marcius
Handwritten manuscripts were on the wane in the 16th century, with mass-produced books quickly replacing them, so they tended to stay in the small circles of people who could afford them. The CLM 1111 is from the Alsace, but ended up in the Munich library, so may have moved around.
I thought you might like to take a look in case there's a possible connection Between George Marci and Iohannes Marcus Marci.
-----------------
Also, on a paleographical note... Note the looong serif on the "i" on the second and fourth lines. This is an uncommon way to write "i" (I have to really search to find examples) and matches the "i" in "chiton" "imiltos" "nim" and (to some extent) "mich" on 116v.
Also, the small looped "n" is also uncommon and close to the "n" in "nim".
Note also the 3rd character in the 2nd row. It's probably not "r" (r wasn't written this way unless it had a tail and this is not a tail), it's probably an open-top "p" (although I'm not completely sure) and might be the same long-serif open-top "p" that is above "ven mus mel".
It's not the same handwriting as the 116v marginalia, and one can see the evolution from Gothic to Humanist text (the ascender loops are gone, as gradually occurred in the 16th century), but there are enough similarities that MAYBE George Marci learned to write in the same region as the 116v marginalia writer.
|
|
|
| [Essentials] Counts discussion |
|
Posted by: Koen G - 18-08-2018, 02:49 PM - Forum: Voynich Talk
- Replies (18)
|
 |
I just made a new thread to gather all counts of things: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Here any additions can be suggested. Count VViews, please make abundant use of your editing rights here, I must have forgotten quite a bit of things we've counted before.
Did we ever reach a definite count of the total number of human figures?
|
|
|
|