(08-11-2016, 07:41 AM)stellar Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.If you don't vote in this poll, I will count it as you don't know.  If you count outside of the answers being higher or lower, I will count it as a null.  

Please vote as I'm looking to gain some insight into the text and you all being highly smart with the VMS I need your partnership and this is what this forum is for.

Results will be released in two weeks.

(08-11-2016, 09:05 AM)-JKP- Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

(08-11-2016, 07:41 AM)stellar Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.If you don't vote in this poll, I will count it as you don't know.  If you count outside of the answers being higher or lower, I will count it as a null.  

Please vote as I'm looking to gain some insight into the text and you all being highly smart with the VMS I need your partnership and this is what this forum is for.

Results will be released in two weeks.

There are some places in the manuscript where the vord breaks are reasonably clear. I'm not certain of the count on this paragraph, however.

This one is more difficult because it crosses the plant in several places and there is curvature in the photograph the makes it harder to judge whether those are spaces on the far right. I think there are approximately 58 vords.


And yes, there is subjectivity in judging some of the vord breaks, but I'm sure you already knew some sections were harder than others.

(08-11-2016, 01:07 PM)Anton Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I counted 55 vords, recognizing spaces in some places where perhaps spaces are not intended.