Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Online Users |
There are currently 367 online users. » 6 Member(s) | 359 Guest(s) Bing, Google, luiscrassus
|
Latest Threads |
alchemical herbals
Forum: Codicology and Paleography
Last Post: MarcoP
1 hour ago
» Replies: 31
» Views: 21,293
|
A Ardıç - "The Code Is De...
Forum: News
Last Post: Koen G
2 hours ago
» Replies: 53
» Views: 3,226
|
Favorite Plant Tournament...
Forum: Voynich Talk
Last Post: Aga Tentakulus
3 hours ago
» Replies: 9
» Views: 281
|
[split] Color annotations...
Forum: Voynich Talk
Last Post: MarcoP
4 hours ago
» Replies: 83
» Views: 42,273
|
Eleven Moon Phases in Fol...
Forum: Astrology
Last Post: voynichrose
5 hours ago
» Replies: 105
» Views: 9,027
|
Solutions [discussion thr...
Forum: Voynich Talk
Last Post: Aga Tentakulus
Yesterday, 07:19 PM
» Replies: 56
» Views: 9,966
|
Why not positional variat...
Forum: Analysis of the text
Last Post: Aga Tentakulus
Yesterday, 07:01 PM
» Replies: 69
» Views: 8,109
|
Big Red Weirdos
Forum: Voynich Talk
Last Post: Cile cile
Yesterday, 06:11 PM
» Replies: 64
» Views: 45,099
|
Origin of the Shield Shap...
Forum: Imagery
Last Post: Dobri
Yesterday, 04:25 PM
» Replies: 101
» Views: 4,283
|
New Decoder
Forum: Voynich Talk
Last Post: bi3mw
Yesterday, 11:16 AM
» Replies: 9
» Views: 930
|
|
|
TED-ED Video |
Posted by: -JKP- - 26-05-2017, 05:22 PM - Forum: Analysis of the text
- Replies (20)
|
 |
I just watched the short video on the VMS created by TED-ED and scripted by Stephen Bax.
The graphics are charming. I enjoyed them, and they'll probably reach a broader audience and generate increased interest in the VMS.
There is, however, a statement in the video that I find questionable, and since this section is for analysis of the text, I thought it might be interesting to discuss it.
Here is the statement:
"Cryptologists say the writing has all the characteristics of a real language."
Is that really true? Is that the general consensus among cryptologists? Is there a general consensus among cryptologists?
I'm not a cryptologist, but my personal feeling is that the text diverges quite significantly from natural language, particularly if the spaces are taken literally. I have never seen any natural language with such a high level of repetition combined with such a high degree of positional rigidity, not only in the word-tokens themselves, but also in the construction of individual lines.
The only way I can see this being natural language (and I still haven't discounted the possibility) is IF the spaces are contrived AND there are nulls AND some of the letter forms that appear similar are possibly intended to be differentiated by details (e.g., the length or direction of tails) OR if it is another kind of system entirely (musical notes, numbers, semaphore, etc., which is then converted back into natural language).
Your thoughts?
Mod edit: The link to the video is You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view..
|
|
|
Stephen Bax's TED-ED video |
Posted by: Koen G - 26-05-2017, 02:10 PM - Forum: News
- Replies (15)
|
 |
Stephen Bax just updated his website, announcing that he scripted a Voynich video for TED-ED (not to be confused with TED-talks).
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Direct link to the video on TED-ED's YouTube channel:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
It is basically the standard introduction to the manuscript, and experienced researchers won't learn anything new. I like the TED-ED animators' style though, and the animations they did of some of the pages are really beautiful.
|
|
|
The frog |
Posted by: ReneZ - 21-05-2017, 09:00 AM - Forum: Imagery
- Replies (103)
|
 |
There are only three illustration of animals in the herbal and pharmaceutical section: a pair of snakes, a dragon and a frog.
The snakes and dragon are very common in medieval illustrated herbals, but the frog isn't.
In fact, beside snakes and dragons, one would commonly see scorpions and dogs, and in almost all cases the animal has something to do with the medicinal properties of the herb.
What would the frog mean?
It is on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. in the upper right corner:
f102r2_frog.jpg (Size: 18.04 KB / Downloads: 708)
This is clearly the same herb as on f32v:
f032v_crd.jpg (Size: 44.1 KB / Downloads: 530)
The "artist" has taken the trouble to bring in one leaf and one flower to show that it's the same.
Which herb would have something to do with frogs?
One option is given by the Tractatus de Herbis tradition. There is usually a frog ('rana') drawn closely to a herb called 'ranaria'. This is because the books show herbs and animals mixed, and they are organised alphabetically. Here's an example from Munich CLM 28531, which I have rotated for layout purposes:
clm28531_frog.jpg (Size: 20.66 KB / Downloads: 524)
The herb does not look at all like the herb in the Voynich MS.
Another incidental example I found is in a Latin illustrated copy of Dioscurides, also in Munich: CLM 337:
clm337_frog.jpg (Size: 20.41 KB / Downloads: 527)
Now this one is a bit more interesting as the herb does bear a passing resemblance to the VMS herb.
This one is Cyminon Agrestis, which in the more common Greek versions is Κύμινον άγριον
(hope that comes out).
After this, it gets more difficult. In Greek copies of Dioscurides (I only checked the online ones in Naples and in New York), the herb looks very different, and there is no frog. The reason of the frog seems to be a standard venom-related issue, but I haven't seen any specific reason why a frog and not a dragon/snake/scorpion.
Unfortunately, the scan of CLM 337 is not of the best quality, and the Beneventan script takes quite a while to get used to.
So, no great answers yet, but perhaps someone else knows a bit more.
|
|
|
marginalia: was it personal? |
Posted by: peteb - 10-05-2017, 12:32 AM - Forum: Marginalia
- Replies (8)
|
 |
I have read accounts where medieval scribes transcribing a manuscript have added their personal thoughts as marginalia, not only that, but substituted more familiar words for those they could not understand.
Is this old news?
|
|
|
Tarot imagery and such |
Posted by: Diane - 08-05-2017, 01:15 PM - Forum: Astrology
- Replies (4)
|
 |
Please, now... everyone stay CALM.
As Marco will know, I expect, there is astronomical imagery within the medieval paintings set on card, as well as in contemporary paintings on walls or in manuscripts.
Now, for various reasons, not least then-current fashions, we also find images relating to those put on card in other media. It is mainly studies of those other media which have produced the more scholarly books and papers.
But to consider paintings put on card, as on paper, during the fourteenth- or fifteenth- century is not an outrageous thing to do, even if the pictures were used for playing games, or .. whatever. Even prognostication.
One of the picture-cycles which has shown some clear iconographic links to images on cards (not only the shorter, tarot deck but the larger tarocchi) are those in the Shifanoia at Ferrara. And the d'Este were the ruling family there.
Another - which Aby Warburg spoke about in about 1912 - is in the old Meeting Hall in Padua. Often distinguished by being called 'il Salone'.
Which is a pretty long introduction to a picture of a lobster. 
|
|
|
|