Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Latest Threads |
Voynich manuscript is dec...
Forum: Analysis of the text
Last Post: i_want_links_damit
2 hours ago
» Replies: 41
» Views: 23,844
|
[split] Aga Tentakulus' L...
Forum: Analysis of the text
Last Post: Bluetoes101
7 hours ago
» Replies: 43
» Views: 15,077
|
Favorite Plant Tournament...
Forum: Voynich Talk
Last Post: Bluetoes101
7 hours ago
» Replies: 2
» Views: 202
|
Favorite Plant Tournament...
Forum: Voynich Talk
Last Post: Koen G
8 hours ago
» Replies: 1
» Views: 167
|
Month names collection / ...
Forum: Marginalia
Last Post: R. Sale
10 hours ago
» Replies: 94
» Views: 4,139
|
VM Materials origin
Forum: Physical material
Last Post: magnesium
Yesterday, 07:52 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 45
|
I've deciphered the Voyni...
Forum: Voynich Talk
Last Post: oshfdk
Yesterday, 10:22 AM
» Replies: 83
» Views: 3,089
|
Need advice for testing o...
Forum: Analysis of the text
Last Post: Torsten
Yesterday, 12:42 AM
» Replies: 90
» Views: 3,718
|
Big red stain on f103r an...
Forum: Physical material
Last Post: Bluetoes101
11-07-2025, 12:27 PM
» Replies: 21
» Views: 15,272
|
Making a test for transla...
Forum: Analysis of the text
Last Post: oshfdk
11-07-2025, 10:35 AM
» Replies: 10
» Views: 400
|
|
|
The Medici agenda |
Posted by: Linda - 18-08-2017, 09:50 PM - Forum: Provenance & history
- No Replies
|
 |
So this is an idea where the Medici family continued to show secrets of the world in their commissioning of art. I see connections to Botticellis paintings with regard to both geography and flora. Let me show you a later painting which I see as representing the world in its entirety.
Calumny of Appeles The timing of this painting is just after Columbus' journey.
![[Image: 1200px-Sandro_Botticelli_021.jpg]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/85/Sandro_Botticelli_021.jpg/1200px-Sandro_Botticelli_021.jpg)
Now take a look at this projection. Not perfect but do you see the similarities?
![[Image: worldmapper_basefuller.jpg]](http://www.viewsoftheworld.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/worldmapper_basefuller.jpg)
Australia would need to swing around 90 degrees with Antarctica making up the top half of Venus to the far left of the painting. Can you see the arm? The old hag is a T-O map trifecta of Africa, making up her head, Europe, the UK is her pointy sleeve, and Asia with India as the trailing dress. Note she is toe to toe with the tip of North America,
Jason Davies has a tool which can help make the shapes morph more closely to those in the painting
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. I haven't been able to capture it yet but will see what I can do.
If you then go back in time, you find Cosimo Medici to be connected with various people that could have been part of making the manuscript, from geographers to cryptologists and astronomers, among others. I still see quite 13 as showing the ecumene through bodies of water, and the Birth of Venus seels to me a continuation of what is shown geographically, followed by Primavera, which to me combines more geography with a multitude of flora, in addition to the generally accepted imagery of the graces etc. Calumny of Appeles then shows the entire globe of land masses in its entirety.
In 1439 the works of Strabo were introduced to Italy at the Council of Florence, You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. who also knew Columbus
I see this as the information shown in quite 13. Notably, Strabo's ecumene ends exactly where the quite 13 one does. He also saw Sagres point as the wester most point in Europe, which is where Quite 13 starts it's journey.
![[Image: C%2BB-Geography-Map1-StrabosMap.PNG]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/61/C%2BB-Geography-Map1-StrabosMap.PNG)
Strabo also incorporated the work of Hecataeus in his writings, I see his periplusas being recreated in Quite 13 as well.
There are more connections, but I will stop here to see if anyone sees a glimmer of what I am seeing in this.
|
|
|
Gallows distribution |
Posted by: davidjackson - 16-08-2017, 09:28 PM - Forum: Analysis of the text
- Replies (4)
|
 |
Can anyone out there confirm or deny this?
Stolfi mentions in a You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. that he found the following gallows distribution:
Quote: I just noticed a curious coincidence:
>
> total *occurrences* of words (tokens) with
>
> 0 gallows .... 17363 (49.4%)
> 1 gallows .... 17443 (49.6%)
> 2 gallows .... 323 (0.9%)
> 3 gallows .... 3
> Many (if not all) of the 2- and 3-gallows words are probably due to
> omission of word spaces by the transcribers. Other data errors may
> have injected a few percent of noise in these figures.
>
> Still, the coincidence is intriguing. It seems safe to assume that a
> "correct" Voynichese word can have at most one gallows; so we have
> almost exact 50-50 split between 0-g and 1-g words.
Even curiouser:
w/o gallows with gallows
+--------------+--------------+
w/o tables | 8772 (25.2%) | 9016 (25.9%) |
+--------------+--------------+
with tables | 8591 (24.7%) | 8423 (24.2%) |
+--------------+--------------+
These are counts of tokens (word instances) in the whole majority-vote
transcription; minus key sequences, labels, unreadable/contentious
tokens, and the 326 tokens with two or more gallows.
The "gallows" are the EVA letters [ktfp], including any platforms
("ct", "cth", "ith") and isolated "e" suffixes ("te", "cthe", etc.).
The "tables" are the letters "ch", "sh", "ee", and any isolated "e"s
that are not attached to a gallows letter.
I can't be bothered to dig into this right now - does anybody have the stats to prove or disprove this antique statement?
|
|
|
Computational Attacks on Abbreviated Text |
Posted by: -JKP- - 16-08-2017, 01:52 AM - Forum: Analysis of the text
- Replies (14)
|
 |
D. O'Donovan [corrected] posted an excerpt of Latin text on her blog and included the interlinear expansion of the abbreviations You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view..
The original manuscript is BSB CLM 13031 f12r], but I didn't see a credit for the expansion, and I noticed there are mismatches between the original and the expanded text, so here is my version, which I believe is more true to the original (note that letters in red in the original are likely intended to be capital letters).
Praepositio* et praeterea per dyptongon scribitum. Pene vero, quod est coniunctio, per E. Pena quod est supplicium per OE Q. littera tunc recte ponitur, cum illia statim .U. littera sequitur et alia quelibet una plures ve vocales iunguntur. ita ut una syllaba fiat. Cetera per .C. scribuntur. Que [Quae] pronomen cum .A. scribendum. que coniunctio sine .A.
[*I'm not sure why the scribe has written this as Pre perpositio as I'm fairly sure Prepositio/Praepositio was intended.]
My version is not intended as a criticism of the one posted on O'Donovan's site, I just feel it should be as accurate as possible if it's going to be discussed on the forum (and I enjoy expanding the abbreviations).
I've been wanting to write in more detail about the way Latin was expanded in the 15th century, and have touched on it in some of my blogs, because it does dramatically change the statistical properties of word-frequency and other computational attacks, but can't seem to find enough time, so I thought this short excerpt might be enough to provide a start for a thread on the computational properties of medieval texts (note that the example above is about three centuries before the VMS).
[Latin abbreviations are old news to some members, but if you are not familiar with them yet, Cappelli is an excellent resource.]
Even if you study Latin abbreviations, and attempt to break the VMS text out into Latin (as has been tried by a number of researchers, and as has been recently attempted by P. Lockerby), that doesn't mean the correspondence between VMS glyphs or glyph-combinations is consistent. One can see in this short excerpt that "quod" was abbreviated in two different ways. It was not uncommon for words to be abbreviated four or five different ways. By the 15th century, long after the above excerpt was written, handwriting was messier, abbreviations more frequent, and consistency in the abbreviations even less than one sees in the above example.
These abbreviation systems were not limited to Latin. Scribes used many of the same conventions in their native tongues. If the VMS were Greek or Italian, for example, many of the same abbreviation conventions would apply except that the symbols are expanded into letters appropriate to that language.
So... AFA computat'nal attacks on lett'r frequency, et al, r concern'd...even if the VMS were a substitution code, the odds of it being one-to-one substitution are not very good. The use of abbreviations was deeply ingrained in the thinking of medieval scribes and the VMS has many short word-tokens (more than some of the transcriptions indicate).
|
|
|
|