| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Online Users |
There are currently 1114 online users. » 6 Member(s) | 1101 Guest(s) Applebot, Baidu, Bing, Facebook, Google, Twitter, Yandex, Juan_Sali, Slavik1980
|
| Latest Threads |
Deconstructing the VMS : ...
Forum: Analysis of the text
Last Post: nablator
53 minutes ago
» Replies: 24
» Views: 494
|
Aries Design: Truly Aries...
Forum: Imagery
Last Post: eggyk
2 hours ago
» Replies: 45
» Views: 2,931
|
No text, but a visual cod...
Forum: Theories & Solutions
Last Post: ololololo
2 hours ago
» Replies: 1,882
» Views: 1,309,364
|
I am not convinced by the...
Forum: Provenance & history
Last Post: Bernd
3 hours ago
» Replies: 36
» Views: 1,090
|
What if it's a "Lossy Enc...
Forum: Voynich Talk
Last Post: Rafal
5 hours ago
» Replies: 14
» Views: 309
|
Voynichese is a numeric c...
Forum: Theories & Solutions
Last Post: ololololo
6 hours ago
» Replies: 202
» Views: 21,654
|
Voynich is encrypted ENOC...
Forum: Theories & Solutions
Last Post: Radim Dobeš
7 hours ago
» Replies: 364
» Views: 53,215
|
The 'Chinese' Theory: Fo...
Forum: Theories & Solutions
Last Post: Linda
Yesterday, 03:09 PM
» Replies: 803
» Views: 214,011
|
Month names collection / ...
Forum: Marginalia
Last Post: Koen G
Yesterday, 02:38 PM
» Replies: 347
» Views: 81,281
|
New members: trouble regi...
Forum: News
Last Post: Strong Test
Yesterday, 02:15 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 173
|
|
|
| A return to f25v - the dragon is the key, obviously, but is it basil? |
|
Posted by: david - 22-02-2017, 09:04 PM - Forum: Imagery
- Replies (61)
|
 |
Well, I must admit that tonight it struck me that it could be basil, as I've been going through different plants that were associated with wyrms and their ilk.
![[Image: image.jpg?q=f25v-743-629-678-584]](https://voynich.ninja/extractor/image.jpg?q=f25v-743-629-678-584)
![[Image: basil-bsp.jpg]](http://305iir24zxo5sg6qj2nwjqpy.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/basil-bsp.jpg)
What really tipped me off was the mnemonic of the dragon. T.H. White makes mention of basil being an antidote to basilisks, and by extension, to other stinging worms such as scorpions and the like. He notes:
Quote:Basil and Basilisk both derive from the same Greek root meaning Royal, so the one was presumed to be the antidote to the other.
Turner's Herbal says: "it is goode for the stryking of a dragon or sea serpent".
In White's 1954 translation of The Books of Beasts (a translation of a 12th century bestiary) the scribe mentions that basil is used to catch animals under the sign of Scorpio, as it is the active ingredient in the bait recipe given. Aldrovandus adds a recipe including basil to catch sea scorpions, as well as carp for some reason.
The only thing stopping me from crowing here is that despite the obvious similarities in the crowned leaf arrangement of the depiction and original plant, basil leaves have a single distinctive central vein with arteries radiating out to the leafs edge, whilst the Voynich plant has multiple strong central veins with no radiating arteries.
Can anyone think of a plausible reasoning for this? Is there a close family of the basil with these attributes, or do dried basil leaves go like this?
|
|
|
| List of line-initial words that only appear line-initially? |
|
Posted by: nickpelling - 22-02-2017, 09:48 AM - Forum: Analysis of the text
- Replies (8)
|
 |
Has anyone compiled a list of line-initial words that only appear line-initially?
I was reminded of this by a 2008 Cipher Mysteries post (which I had inevitably forgotten about until stumbling over it yesterday) where I mentioned that Marke Fincher had pointed out to me that ycheo[-] and ysheo[-] only ever appear line-initially, along with something similar with dche[-].
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
|
|
|
| Scribal hands and Currier languages |
|
Posted by: Koen G - 14-02-2017, 08:20 PM - Forum: Analysis of the text
- Replies (15)
|
 |
While writing my latest blog post, I read on Rene's site You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. that Currier concluded that six to eight scribes wrote in the manuscript. That's main text, ignoring marginalia. I have no experience with telling apart different handwritings, so I thought I'd ask here.
Has this been confirmed? Has anyone else studied this in detail?
Of how many hands can we be certain? Again, only considering core text, not marginalia or quire numbers.
And how do the different hands correspond to Currier A and B?
And are we even certain about the clean distinction between these "languages" to begin with?
|
|
|
| foldouts line transcriptions |
|
Posted by: Davidsch - 08-02-2017, 07:39 PM - Forum: Physical material
- Replies (4)
|
 |
During analysis of the text I've located an anomaly
Often this an indication there is something wrong.
It surprised me that after all this time I did not notice it before,
and rather inconvenient, because now I realize many (of my old) statistics are actually false.
The foldouts, have a transcription which is spread along the width of the foldouts !!
f101r1 => the transcript is actually of page f100v + r1 + r2.
By inspection it sounds logical. But it is rather special, having such long lines of text !!
f101v2 => i did not know this is a foldout !! Now You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
tells that f101v2 actually holds the transcript for 101v2 + v1 !!
Since there is no picture of the foldout, I do not know if the text really is 1 long line,
or that actually the text has to be cut up into 2 pages.
Zandbergen writes: "There are 10 lines of text in three paragraphs, all at the bottom of the page. The text crosses the vertical fold between f101v2 and f101v1 and spans the total width of the foldout folio. The last line has been centred, also in the middle of the pair of pages. The fold, which is rather damaged, makes reading of part of the text very difficult."
But, You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., tells that
# This page spans two normal-size panels (f101v2 + f101v1) in a
# four-panel fold-out folio. They were originally entered as two
# separate pages (f101v2 and f101v1). However the text and plants
# clearly connect across the joining fold. [Stolfi]
I would like the possible to decide for myself if it is or is not a long line of text.
Unfortunately, I did not find such a picture of the entire stretched foldout.
f89r2
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
It is not difficult to see that indeed the text is written as one long line along 89r2 + r3
f89v2
It is not difficult to see that indeed the text is written as one long line along 89v3 + v2
---
Question to René "so called" Z.: are there more texts which are really long foldout texts?
|
|
|
| What is the VMS text? |
|
Posted by: stellar - 07-02-2017, 11:29 PM - Forum: Analysis of the text
- No Replies
|
 |
I believe a poll here is needed for sort of a guide that everyone can see and maybe agree upon. There are many perspectives and theories of just what the text is. Maybe a consensus can be reached regarding the VMS text by people who have been working in Voynich studies for years. I will leave this as an ongoing poll and open so that we can acquire the most data on the texts meaning relating to what it could be.
Please part take in this experiment as it will be beneficial to all. Your input is valuable regardless of how long you have held your ideas about this subject. Also as time goes by and if your ideas change just state that here in a post. We have to share more on this topic as if we have enough input maybe we could target the text in a more coherent manner. I find that the most interested minds with a great deal of time invested in this subject may point us in the right direction; as to move most of us in a similar direction in targeting the Voynich Manuscript methodology for a possible reading or not.
|
|
|
|