Subject: Decoded The True Human Decipherment of Voynich MS 408 & The Ancient Secret of 'Amrutam' (The Elixir of Life)
Dear Curators and Researchers,
I am writing this to all because, amidst the daily influx of fake, AI-generated "decipherment" claims you undoubtedly receive, my research stands entirely apart. My decoding methodology does not rely on any AI generation tools or random automated guesses. It is a genuine "Human Decipherment" born from an experience I had 35 years ago.
The Secret Key (The Ancient Folk Language): About 35 years ago, during my childhood, I playfully learned a secret "Janapada Bhasha" (an ancient Indian folk cryptographic language). In ancient times, this language was strictly utilized by our ancestors to securely communicate highly confidential information. When I first learned about the Voynich Manuscript, I made numerous attempts to unlock its secrets and failed repeatedly. Finally, I decided to apply the structural and linguistic patterns of my childhood secret language to the Voynich script. To my absolute astonishment, the cryptographic patterns of the Voynich Manuscript and the patterns of my ancient folk language matched perfectly!
Mathematical Continuity & TDA Proof: However, I did not stop at mere intuition; I rigorously tested this hypothesis to clear any doubts. Using Topological Data Analysis (TDA), I achieved a 91% conversion accuracy rate. I discovered that every page, line, and word in this manuscript is structured exactly like a strict "Mathematical Formula." If a single mistake is made, the entire calculation falls apart and the meaning is lost. From the first page to the very last, the manuscript connects seamlessly like a continuous highway, without any breaks or confusion. It is only after conducting these exhaustive, repetitive tests that I can state my findings with such absolute certainty.
The Ultimate Revelation: The Secret of 'Amrutam' The most crucial revelation—whether you believe it immediately or not, I must state the truth—is that the ultimate secret concealed within this manuscript is the preparation of "Amrutam" (The Elixir of Immortality / The Elixir of Life). Every element detailed in this book aligns perfectly with ancient Indian texts, and I have finally found the answer as to why it was encoded with such extreme secrecy.
The manuscript details exactly how to prepare this elixir, which is designed to extend human lifespan by 5 to 10 times, reverse the aging process to restore youth, and completely shield the body from disease. It provides explicit, pin-to-pin instructions on exactly which ingredients to use, the step-by-step preparation methods, and the precise astronomical timings required for the chemical reactions.
This is precisely why the Voynich Manuscript is structurally divided into these 6 distinct sections:
1.Botanical Alchemy: Extracting the core essence and sap from the specific medicinal plants.
2.Astronomical & Astrological: The exact planetary alignments and cosmic timings required to prepare the medicine.
3.Biological / Neural Regeneration: How the elixir flows through human cells and neural pathways to reverse aging.
4.Cosmological: Harnessing the universal and natural energy required for the alchemical process.
5.Pharmaceutical Alchemy: The precise proportions, mixing ratios, and purification methods.
6.Recipes / Final Execution Matrix: The ultimate, final procedural steps for executing the elixir's formula.
Because I have completely decoded and understood the entirety of this book, I can declare this with absolute conviction, leaving zero room for doubt. I am fully prepared to present my complete methodology and findings to your team. I sincerely hope that amidst the daily noise of AI-generated claims, you will recognize and give precedence to a genuine, historical human breakthrough.
This is very off-the-wall, but has anyone here yet explored the idea that the text could be representing visemes? The idea would be that a deaf person decided to create a script based on lipreading, in which multiple phonemes would be collapsed.
I grant that it would be hard to explain the purpose of doing it. Transcribing a speaking person would not be swift enough. Converting a standard text would result in information loss.
I have been looking at the manuscript with a fresh perspective focusing on the functional logic of the layout rather than just searching for a known language.
My core observations:
1. Word Growth: I noticed a "child/children" pattern where roots like pcho and qodo grow with suffixes as you move down the page.
2. Anatomical Mapping: The words seem to change based on the part of the plant they are next to. Lighter at the top and heavier at the roots.
3. Preparation Verbs: I believe the suffixes are instructions. For example, -ol could mean boil, -and could mean grind, and -ar could mean burn or dry.
4. The Apprentice Theory: I suspect the last page was written by an apprentice. They were trying to translate the masters difficult shorthand into common Latin or German but gave up.
I would like to put this out there for anyone who has the tools to see if these action suffixes hold up across the rest of the book. I think the key is in the process, not just the names.
Decoded at Last: The 'Ri-Language' Unlocks the 600-Year-Old Voynich Mystery [b]Ri language is very old ([b]Folk", "Rustic", or "Rura).[/b][/b]
When traditional decryption failed number of times.........
.... finally, our breakthrough arrived through a unique "Ri-Language," method, an ancient framework for encrypted communication. Remarkably, the structural patterns of this ancient language perfectly mirrored the Voynich script. This alignment led to our most significant discovery: Dynamic Contextual Pattern Formation. We realized the text operates dynamically. When a word repeats in a sentence, its meaning transforms based on the contextual flow to represent a completely different functional purpose. By shifting our analysis to encompass the entire line and paragraph context, we finally broke the cipher and revealed the book's true secrets.
I wasn't going to hop ship, but everyone got silent over there. It's weird when things get silent on Reddit. Anyway- a brief overview for those who may not have seen any of my stuff over there. Attached are the annotated versions presented as well as links to the original posts.
A few days ago I decided to dive into the Voynich, just as a curiosity. That was when I realized that by viewing the image on the left-hand side of p.67 as a proto-clock, you can (without stretching) arrive at the conclusion that there was a very short ~3.5 hour difference between sunrise and sunset. In my original post, I included calculations for 3-5 hours for safe margin- all of which leave you somewhere in the Arctic Circle.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
I then took a bit of a closer look at the text, in which I analyzed the 'P' ('gallow') as a punctuation as opposed to a linguistic character. I know this is not the first time this concept has been floated, but I do not believe anyone has proposed it in the capacity I have. If they have, please let me know. I don't want to make inaccurate statements here or taking credit for long-standing ideas. By breaking it down by the prominence of 'P', a lingual structure seems to become easily visible with observable frequencies. This methodology is applicable to the entirety of the manuscript without variation.
In conversation to gain a better understanding regarding the conversion in terms of linguistic entropy, I also noted the consistency of '8' with certain characters throughout the entirety of the script, "a", "o", "low 9 (y)", "c-c", and "aN" throughout the entirety of the manuscript. Understanding the '8'->'8bre' in Italian clerical records, I wondered if a similar methodology would work here where the preceding and succeeding character represent different intonations to produce variations of "otto", such as "otti","otte", "ott", etc. It was called into question the consistency of this pairing, so I have attached a comprehensive version of a single page showing both the pairings with '8' and all content body breaks as well.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
There is one error line break in the bottom half in the third line up with the '8aN'. Please disregard that one.
This image is the initial model, although I also made additional variants based on my inability to differentiate a couple & have attached those below as well.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
I also analyzed 'Map with Ship' by Marco Polo, which seems to have revealed some interesting consistencies between the two- and a potentially corresponding page in the Voynich, based on both context and chemical irritant/staining and potentially some corresponding superficial lines. Based on this, I ponder/propose the Polo family as the potential authors of the Voynich, although perhaps later translated by scribes or simply transcribed a copy of a pre-existing body based on the Polos' work. I did elaborate a little more in an additional post as well.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Anyway, I just thought I would share this here as I was told you might enjoy it. I am willing to answer any questions or explore more, but please be respectful if you choose to engage- that's all I ask.
I recently put together a little tool to aid with analysing the text - a little project I'd wanted to do for a long while, and finally leveraged some AI coding tools to speed up the process. The tool inputs the ZL transcription - along with configuration as to how you want to pre-process the glyphs - and outputs a ton of aggregations for interrogation.
Tool: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Code & docs: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Currently, it shows the following:
* Basic transition probabilities (including word/line/paragraph/page boundaries)
* Ngram analyser (1-grams, 2-grams, 3-grams)
* Word position preference of glyphs
* Page position preference of glyphs (by character number / line number)
* Page position preference of glyphs (by physical position - data from Voynichese.com)
While most of this has been done before, the more novel part of the tool is that it additionally produces these visualises for a large number of subsets of the manuscript - by language (A, B); by scribe (1,2,3,4,5); by illustration. The cool part is then you can compare (e.g., Currier A vs B; or Hand 2 vs Hand 4) charts side-by-side, and even "diff" them to see at a glance where the large differences lie. This was largely as a response to the common critique of analyses where interesting signal may be lost by aggregating over non homogeneous pages of text.
If one was keen to change the preprocessing applied - while this can't be done in the hosted web app itself, it can be done by cloning the repo & making the changes. I may be happy to take requests here. There are a ton of other things it could show also which could be added to future releases - entropy, LAAFU stuff, word boundaries, glyph equivalence. Again, not that these things haven't been done before, but I believe the ability to interact with them and quickly & visually compare between sections is the most valuable.
Do let me know if it's useful and if you find any bugs, or have any suggestions.
This was inspired by writings by Nick Pelling, Rene Zandbergen, Patrick Feaster, Sean Palmer, Emma May Smith, Marco Ponzi, and many others.
Its a pretty interesting glyph, thought it should have its own thread.
picnic table glyph aka EVA-x
Pages with most appearances of Eva-x
9 appearances in f Ros
7 appearances in f 57v
5 appearances in f 66r
3 appearances in f 46r
Section by Illustration Type: T_ext, H_erbal, C_osmological, S_tars, fRos_ette
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
T fRos
x3 x4
In Labels <f66r> <fRos>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C fRos
x7 x5
In Circular text <f57v> <fRos>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
H H T H S S S S S S S S S S S { 03 sections }
x3 x2 x2 x1 x1 x1 x2 x1 x1 x1 x1 x2 x1 x1 x2 { 22 count }
In Paragraphs f46r, f55r, f66r, f94r, f104r, f105r, f105v, f106v, f107v, f108r, f108v, f111r, f113v, f114v, f115v { 15 folios }
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total appearances:
C T H H H S fRos
<f57v> <f66r> <f46r> <f55r> <f94r>, 11x folios, 1x Rosettes
In 2 appearances the picnic_table looks like its left foot has a c-shape (or it is joined to Eva-e )
f66r Line 65 {left_foot_c}
f46 r Line 01 {left_foot_c}
See also:
Origin of the 'Picnic Table' Glyph
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
N.B. Counts using ZL3b-n.
Some counts maybe wrong.
fRos is a Cosmo page by illustration type but it is separate here.
Hi all,
I'm all new here, so please bear over if this issue has already been brought up a million times - but a search didn't bring it up as existing,
so I'll jump in both feet and kindly ask this forum for a heads-up on something that puzzles me.
I came across another book, called "Von dem Gang des Himels(sic) und Sternen" [HuS].
It's a German book from the second half of the 15th century, and freely accessible from the Morgan library.
It struck me, how the astrological illustrations are quite reminiscent of the same in the VM - only of higher quality.
I'm aware there are only so many ways you can illustrate an astrological ram, a lion, and say a set of scales, but the two artists in question share a surprising (to me) number of details.
The same paw is lifted, the same shape of tails, the extended tongue of leo, the sane angle on the "libra" scales, the band of stars connecting the pisces together.
There are so many similar details that, for the untrained eye, it would seem the illustrator of the VM simply made an exact (but hasty) copy of the HUS illustrations.
This may of course be a case of random similarity, or a question of one book inspiring the other.
My problem is, two-fold:
The VM was presumably never published to the broad public, so the author(s) of "Himels und Sternen" would not have access to reading it, thus inspiration would likely be in the
HuS -> Voynich direction.
And this proposes my problem 2: HuS is of a later date than the VM, which puts a spanner in the timing.
