| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Online Users |
There are currently 248 online users.
» 3 Member(s) | 242 Guest(s)
Applebot, Bing, Google, Aga Tentakulus, anyasophira
|
|
|
| Comparability oft the Voynich Complex |
|
Posted by: voynichbombe - 04-07-2015, 08:35 PM - Forum: Voynich Talk
- Replies (10)
|
 |
For a while I have been looking for topics comparable to the Voynich*. I do not mean in terms of contents, etc., but in terms of research efforts put into it, and diversity of opinions on it's true nature. And all the stuff that goes along.. I hope you understand what I mean. *It is a complex, really.
So far the "Vynland Map" has been my best guess. But lately I came across a Codex that CAN be read, and yet is regarded as largely unexplained by it's researchers, the Codex Manesse (<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://digi.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/diglit/cpg848">http://digi.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/diglit/cpg848</a><!-- m -->). This is just an example. IF we knew to read the MS, would we really be any smarter? I would love to hear your opinion on this.
Best
Gert
|
|
|
| Is it worthwhile actually trying to identify the plants in the VM? |
|
Posted by: david - 28-06-2015, 07:51 PM - Forum: Imagery
- Replies (20)
|
 |
I have written a rather long post about whether or not it is worthwhile trying to work out the plants in the Voynich.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
I would be interested in what people think. Obviously some people (such as Steve D on the Voynich mailing list) spend a lot of time and effort trying to identify the plants, but we never seem to get anywhere. Is it actually possible to label these plants? I would argue that it isn't.
|
|
|
|
|