| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Latest Threads |
Templars as creators of t...
Forum: Imagery
Last Post: Gregor
34 minutes ago
» Replies: 0
» Views: 16
|
Origin of the Shield Shap...
Forum: Imagery
Last Post: oshfdk
1 hour ago
» Replies: 55
» Views: 1,625
|
Linguistic Patterns Befor...
Forum: Analysis of the text
Last Post: Mauro
2 hours ago
» Replies: 29
» Views: 688
|
Proposition intuitive.
Forum: Analysis of the text
Last Post: dashstofsk
2 hours ago
» Replies: 4
» Views: 90
|
Full Voynich Decode
Forum: Analysis of the text
Last Post: oshfdk
3 hours ago
» Replies: 24
» Views: 811
|
Strong evidence of a stru...
Forum: News
Last Post: Urtx13
6 hours ago
» Replies: 76
» Views: 3,501
|
No text, but a visual cod...
Forum: Analysis of the text
Last Post: Antonio García Jiménez
Yesterday, 07:23 PM
» Replies: 1,530
» Views: 626,396
|
Eleven Moon Phases in Fol...
Forum: Astrology
Last Post: Dobri
Yesterday, 01:53 PM
» Replies: 92
» Views: 7,969
|
TF-IDF Colored by Scribe ...
Forum: Analysis of the text
Last Post: RobGea
Yesterday, 11:42 AM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 3,073
|
how to use voynich ninja/...
Forum: Voynich Talk
Last Post: ReneZ
Yesterday, 08:51 AM
» Replies: 27
» Views: 1,043
|
|
|
| Switch System |
|
Posted by: Bluetoes101 - 20-04-2025, 01:06 AM - Forum: Analysis of the text
- Replies (20)
|
 |
This system was inspired by the Curve-Line System (CLS). Brain Cham's full work is here - You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view..
A key component of CLS is that EVA: "a" is used to transition Voynich text from curves to lines. I thought of it as a switch from curves to lines.
I believe there are more "switches" and that their function can be defined.
Firstly I map glyphs to one of 3 groups dependant on if they are constructed from backslash \, line | or curve c.
If a glyph is a modified version of this shape I call the modification an addition of a curve.
I find it helpful to think of these assignments as blocks, or jigsaw pieces. Some fit, some do not.
(As adding a curve to a curve results in the same shape, I do not modify them further)
Backslash. Backslash-Curve. Curve. Line-Curve.
![[Image: blocks.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/gJk6RG0K/blocks.jpg)
# Curve
"e": "c", "g": "c", "b": "c", "s": "c", "h": "c",
# Backslash
"i": "\\",
# Backslash-Curve
"n": "X", "r": "X", "j": "X", "m": "X", "l": "X",
# Line-Curve
"t": "K", "k": "K", "p": "K", "f": "K", "d": "K", "q": "K",
The outlier in the mapping is "d", it belongs in "Line-Curve" due to its functionality in the text but is not constructed from line |.
Double \ is used due to backslash being a functional unit for the software, the eventual processing will consider it a single unit.
I also had to compromise with | and call it "l" due to similar restrictions which you will see below.
"switch"
If you prefer to think of this as a "transition" or "modifier" that is fine, it does not matter.
The core principle is that my "switch" will change what was on the left to a new thing on the right.
# Switch
"o": ">",
# Switch-Backslash
"a": ">\\",
# Switch-Line
"y": ">l", "c": ">l",
In the below image we have a hole in our jigsaw. Filling it is where "switches" come in. From the shape of the hole left, you may be able to guess which switch we need.
"a" ends with the backslash shape, so that would be a perfect fit. "o" would also work as it has no defined end shape. "y" and "c" would not work as they end in a line.
![[Image: blocks-2.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/90ShbYYf/blocks-2.jpg)
In order to make the code understand how this works "non-conformances" are defined so that miss-matched building blocks are flagged.
Pairs of letters which do not fit together are defined as so.
# Pairings
r"c\\", r"cX", r"cl", r"cK",
r"K\\", r"KX", r"Kl", r"KK",
r"X\\", r"XX", r"Xl", r"XK",
r"\\K", r"\\l", r"\\c",
r"l\\", r"lX", r"lc",
Glyph sequences where a "switch" was used transition from a shape to the same shape are also flagged as non-conforming. We did not transition/switch.
# Sequences
r"c>c", r"c>>c", r"c>>>c", r"c>>>>c",
r"K>c", r"K>>c", r"K>>>c", r"K>>>>c",
r"X>c", r"X>>c", r"X>>>c", r"X>>>>c",
r"\\>\\", r"\\>>\\", r"\\>>>\\", r"\\>>>>\\",
r"\\>X", r"\\>>X", r"\\>>>X", r"\\>>>>X",
r"l>l", r"l>>l", r"l>>>l", r"l>>>>l",
r"l>K", r"l>>K", r"l>>>K", r"l>>>>K",
r">>>>>",
}
The pairs and sequences list complete our "non-conformances".
Some glyphs/pairs require additional mapping.
"ch" and "sh" have been mapped as "c" plus a curve. As so they are "c" which is ">l" plus a curve, all together, so the result is ">K".
"ih" and "ish" have been mapped as "i" (backslash) plus a curve. Which is Backslash-Curve "X"
"e"+ Line-Curve are allowed in a separate process so that outside of this pairing "e" functions normally. It is an interesting combination, and previously I have said that I think it might be some sort of "half-benched" gallows, as I group "d" in with gallows that explains all the "ed" in Currier B. As the text does it, I incorporate it as part of its system, I'm not trying to "win", if score padding was the aim I could use much better tricks.. which leads me to EVA: "l".
"ld" is allowed as a pairing. This was a compromise. Other work I have seen has described "l" as the "joker" or "wildcard", the glyph that can be any shape. I found that for my work allowing just "ld" was good enough. Allowing "l" to "be anything" does bump scores up, but I feel like for the most part it is fairly rigid and performs a normal Backslash-Curve function.
For testing I used "ZL - The "Zandbergen" part of the LZ transliteration effort. v. 3a"
I decided on ambiguous mapping by eye and logged the results. In total I gained +3 conforming words from my choices which may have otherwise been non-conforming.
For the test I used the whole of Q1 excluding f1r. This is so that all of the text was Q1, Language A, Hand 1, Herbal.
In my work I have had 1 eye on Currier B ("ed" being an example) but this system will not work for it. This is aimed at Q1 currently, however I plan on tackling Currier B if this seems at all useful or of any worth to anyone.
I would just like to touch on two pairings which I feel may get brought up.
"yc" and "ys". In my opinion these common pairings are not part of normal Voynich language (amongst others). My system does not touch on "Line As a Functional Unit" phenomenon or such, but I do believe this is most likely at play in these cases. I think this is very clear.
![[Image: ycs.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/nzRV4Jys/ycs.jpg)
The results of my test using the above rules is here.
![[Image: conf.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/JhQzhJK5/conf.jpg)
The full list of non-conforming words is here.
Converted Text with Non-Conformances Highlighted:
Line <f1v.1,@P0>:
Line <f1v.2,+P0>: lkody -> [XK]>K>l
Line <f1v.3,+P0>: dksheey -> [KK]>Kcc>l
Line <f1v.4,+P0>:
Line <f1v.5,+P0>:
Line <f1v.6,+P0>:
Line <f1v.7,+P0>: choees -> >[K>c]cc, lchiody -> X>[K\]>K>l
Line <f1v.8,+P0>:
Line <f1v.9,+P0>:
Line <f1v.10,+P0>: taor -> K>[\>X]
Line <f2r.1,@P0>:
Line <f2r.2,+P0>: chkar -> >[KK]>\X
Line <f2r.3,+P0>:
Line <f2r.4,+P0>: aiidy -> >\\[\K]>l, chtod -> >[KK]>K
Line <f2r.5,+P0>:
Line <f2r.6,+P0>: dkol -> [KK]>X
Line <f2r.7,+P0>:
Line <f2r.8,+P0>:
Line <f2r.9,+P0>: dls -> [KX]c, daiisol -> K>\\[\c]>X
Line <f2r.10,+P0>:
Line <f2r.11,+P0>: ychain -> >[l>K]>\\X
Line <f2r.12,+P0>:
Line <f2r.13,+P0>:
Line <f2v.1,@P0>: shty -> >[KK]>l
Line <f2v.2,+P0>: loeees -> [X>c]ccc
Line <f2v.3,+P0>:
Line <f2v.4,+P0>:
Line <f2v.5,+P0>:
Line <f2v.6,+P0>: chty -> >[KK]>l
Line <f2v.7,+P0>: chokeos -> >K>K[c>c], chr -> >[KX]
Line <f2v.8,+P0>:
Line <f3r.1,@P0>: tsheos -> K>K[c>c]
Line <f3r.2,+P0>: ycheor -> >[l>K]c>X
Line <f3r.3,+P0>:
Line <f3r.4,+P0>: chag -> >K>[\c]
Line <f3r.5,+P0>:
Line <f3r.6,+P0>: ychtaiin -> >[l>KK]>\\\X
Line <f3r.7,+P0>:
Line <f3r.8,+P0>: ysheor -> >[l>K]c>X, dago -> K>[\c]>
Line <f3r.9,+P0>:
Line <f3r.10,+P0>:
Line <f3r.11,+P0>:
Line <f3r.12,+P0>: okadaiin -> >K>[\K]>\\\X
Line <f3r.13,+P0>:
Line <f3r.14,+P0>:
Line <f3r.15,+P0>:
Line <f3r.16,+P0>:
Line <f3r.17,+P0>: soeom -> [c>c]>X
Line <f3r.18,+P0>:
Line <f3r.19,+P0>: qoeor -> [K>c]>X, qosaiin -> [K>c]>\\\X
Line <f3r.20,+P0>: ycheor -> >[l>K]c>X
Line <f3v.1,@P0>:
Line <f3v.2,+P0>: daiidy -> K>\\[\K]>l
Line <f3v.3,+P0>:
Line <f3v.4,+P0>: een -> c[cX]
Line <f3v.5,+P0>: ychear -> >[l>K]c>\X
Line <f3v.6,+P0>:
Line <f3v.7,+P0>:
Line <f3v.8,+P0>:
Line <f3v.9,+P0>:
Line <f3v.10,+P0>: ochos -> >>[K>c]
Line <f3v.11,+P0>:
Line <f3v.12,+P0>:
Line <f3v.13,+P0>: shkaiin -> >[KK]>\\\X, chky -> >[KK]>l
Line <f3v.14,+P0>:
Line <f4r.1,@P0>: chpady -> >[KK]>[\K]>l
Line <f4r.2,+P0>: shtchy -> >[KK]>K>l, as -> >[\c]
Line <f4r.3,+P0>:
Line <f4r.4,+P0>:
Line <f4r.5,+P0>:
Line <f4r.6,+P0>:
Line <f4r.7,+P0>:
Line <f4r.8,+P0>:
Line <f4r.9,+P0>:
Line <f4r.10,+P0>: shyshol -> >K>[l>K]>X
Line <f4r.11,+P0>:
Line <f4r.12,+P0>:
Line <f4r.13,+P0>:
Line <f4v.1,@P0>: dlod -> [KX]>K
Line <f4v.2,+P0>: shkchor -> >[KK]>K>X
Line <f4v.3,+P0>:
Line <f4v.4,+P0>:
Line <f4v.5,+P0>:
Line <f4v.6,+P0>:
Line <f4v.7,+P0>:
Line <f4v.8,+P0>:
Line <f4v.9,+P0>: cheog -> >K[c>c]
Line <f4v.10,+P0>:
Line <f4v.11,+P0>: shtaiin -> >[KK]>\\\X
Line <f4v.12,+P0>:
Line <f4v.13,+P0>:
Line <f4v.14,+P0>: chtody -> >[KK]>K>l
Line <f5r.1,@P0>: chkoy -> >[KK]>>l, dkshy -> [KK]>K>l
Line <f5r.2,+P0>:
Line <f5r.3,+P0>:
Line <f5r.4,+P0>:
Line <f5r.5,+P0>:
Line <f5r.6,+P0>: qoeeey -> [K>c]cc>l, qoeor -> [K>c]>X
Line <f5r.7,+P0>: qotoeey -> K>[K>c]c>l
Line <f5v.1,@P0>:
Line <f5v.2,+P0>: ychopordg -> >[l>K]>K>[XK]c
Line <f5v.3,+P0>:
Line <f5v.4,+P0>:
Line <f5v.5,+P0>:
Line <f5v.6,+P0>:
Line <f6r.1,@P0>:
Line <f6r.2,+P0>:
Line <f6r.3,+P0>: foeear -> [K>c]c>\X, cheoeees -> >K[c>c]ccc
Line <f6r.4,+P0>: choithy -> >K>[\K]c>l
Line <f6r.5,+P0>:
Line <f6r.6,+P0>:
Line <f6r.7,+P0>:
Line <f6r.8,+P0>: ychol -> >[l>K]>X
Line <f6r.9,+P0>: skaiiodar -> [cK]>\\\>K>\X
Line <f6r.10,+P0>:
Line <f6r.11,+P0>: ychar -> >[l>K]>\X
Line <f6r.12,+P0>:
Line <f6r.13,+P0>:
Line <f6r.14,+P0>: ysho -> >[l>K]>
Line <f6v.1,@P0>: chapchy -> >K>[\K]>K>l
Line <f6v.2,+P0>:
Line <f6v.3,+P0>: rychos -> X>[l>K>c]
Line <f6v.4,+P0>:
Line <f6v.5,+P0>:
Line <f6v.6,+P0>:
Line <f6v.7,+P0>: ychos -> >[l>K>c], ychol -> >[l>K]>X
Line <f6v.8,+P0>: ychor -> >[l>K]>X
Line <f6v.9,+P0>:
Line <f6v.10,+P0>: ychear -> >[l>K]c>\X, kchdy -> K>[KK]>l
Line <f6v.11,+P0>:
Line <f6v.12,+P0>:
Line <f6v.13,+P0>: yodaiin -> >[l>K]>\\\X
Line <f6v.14,+P0>:
Line <f6v.15,+P0>:
Line <f6v.16,+P0>:
Line <f6v.17,+P0>: chaies -> >K>\[\c]c
Line <f6v.18,+P0>: ithor -> [\K]c>X
Line <f6v.19,+P0>: kchos -> K>[K>c]
Line <f6v.20,+P0>:
Line <f6v.21,+P0>: ycheor -> >[l>K]c>X
Line <f7r.1,@P0>: qko -> [KK]>, qoos -> [K>>c]
Line <f7r.2,+P0>:
Line <f7r.3,+P0>:
Line <f7r.4,+P0>: ychey -> >[l>K]c>l, kchos -> K>[K>c]
Line <f7r.5,+P0>:
Line <f7r.6,+P0>: qotoees -> K>[K>c]cc, chkoldy -> >[KK]>>K>l
Line <f7r.7,+P0>:
Line <f7r.8,+P0>:
Line <f7r.9,+P0>:
Line <f7r.10,+P0>:
Line <f8r.1,@P0>:
Line <f8r.2,+P0>: tchty -> K>[KK]>l
Line <f8r.3,+P0>:
Line <f8r.4,+P0>:
Line <f8r.5,+P0>: chky -> >[KK]>l
Line <f8r.6,+P0>: koltoldy -> K>[XK]>>K>l
Line <f8r.7,+P0>:
Line <f8r.10,+P0>:
Line <f8r.11,+P0>: otariin -> >K>\[X\]\X
Line <f8r.12,+P0>:
Line <f8r.15,+P0>: kccs -> K>[l>lc], daiiirihy -> K>\\\\[XX]>l
Line <f8r.16,+P0>: ychey -> >[l>K]c>l
Line <f8r.17,+P0>: chl -> >[KX]
Line <f8r.18,+P0>: cl -> >[lX]
Line <f8r.19,+P0>:
Line <f8r.20,+P0>:
Line <f8v.1,@P0>:
Line <f8v.2,+P0>:
Line <f8v.3,+P0>: dolas -> K>X>[\c]
Line <f8v.4,+P0>:
Line <f8v.5,+P0>:
Line <f8v.6,+P0>:
Line <f8v.7,+P0>:
Line <f8v.8,+P0>: okcholksh -> >K>K>[XK]>K
Line <f8v.9,+P0>: orchl -> >X>[KX]
Line <f8v.10,+P0>:
Line <f8v.11,+P0>:
Line <f8v.12,+P0>:
Line <f8v.13,+P0>: satar -> c>[\K]>\X
Line <f8v.14,+P0>:
Line <f8v.15,+P0>:
Line <f8v.16,+P0>:
Line <f8v.17,+P0>:
Finally.
I used AI. This was for writing code only, all mapping was done by myself with no input or analysis by AI. This is around 6 months of "work", mostly just thinking and reading others work, code just isn't a skill I have.
I also asked it to produce its interpretation (+ my system name) from my favourite drawing in the manuscript for something to post here.
![[Image: switch.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/y8qdcmg9/switch.jpg)
Thank you for reading, if you have any input I would love to hear it.
If you have written anything even roughly in line with my work, I have probably read it and stolen something. So, thank you! Also specifically to Rene for his transliteration and commenting on my other post where I was trying to put this together along with other ninja members who helped me greatly.
|
|
|
| Another proposed solution: Caspari & Faccini (2025) |
|
Posted by: ReneZ - 19-04-2025, 04:52 PM - Forum: Analysis of the text
- Replies (2)
|
 |
This was kindly sent to me, not by any of the authors: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.. (Link to PDF is included).
Tavi may want to add this to the list, as a 'vernacular Italian solution'.
It has a number of the usual issues: inconsistency, no examples of meaningful plaintext, and it cannot work as it is just another simple substitution.
|
|
|
|
| The herbal section of the Voynich Manuscript is the historical part. |
|
Posted by: Gregor - 18-04-2025, 08:33 AM - Forum: Imagery
- Replies (7)
|
|
The Voynich Manuscript (its herbal part) is a kind of compendium of knowledge about our History, in a similar sense to the aluminum plate covered with a thin layer of gold, which was sent into space in the 1970s on the American space probe Pioneer 10.
My proposal for decoding the Voynich Manuscript is that each of its individual pages encodes some different information.
Encryption does not only rely on written form. There is also a whole spectrum of information, which, due to limited possibilities, was also encoded in other forms – e.g. using signs and symbols: see semiotics – from Greek: "semasticos" – significant, "semasia" – meaning", "semeion" – a sign from "sema" – a sign, image, signal.
And this is also how the Voynich Manuscript is encoded. In my opinion, it is not a classic written cipher, but a symbolic rebus – an ideogram.
The Voynich Manuscript, and in particular its herbal section, is, in my opinion, a kind of compendium of knowledge about the Evolution of Life on Earth – starting from its cosmological aspect, through the evolution of man (Darwin's Theory), up to prehistory, and also contemporary history.
In the further part of the herbal section, its author encoded all the most important events from our universal history with such accuracy that many a history textbook could envy his accuracy. What's more, the encoded illustrations of the Manuscript also describe quite contemporary events, as well as those that we will only witness in the future!
When considering the symbolic meaning of the illustrations of the Voynich Manuscript in its herbal section, it is necessary to take into account the individual most important elements of a given plant: root, stem, leaves and also flower. All these elements of the plant constitute encoded information.
Below, for a better illustration of the time-historical continuum in a telegraphic shorthand, a summary of the individual illustrations of the Voynich Manuscript (from 1R to 51V).
Voynich manuscript - herbal (historical) part.
1R - Big Bang and Collapse - the cyclical nature of the universe.
1V - About 4.5 - 5 billion years ago - the Solar System is formed from a gas and dust cloud.
2R - About 3.5 billion years ago - the first organisms - bacteria are formed.
2V - About a billion years ago - the first single-celled organisms (eukaryotes) arose.
3R - About 900 - 700 million years ago - the first multicellular organisms.
3V - About 700 - 600 million years ago - the first invertebrates.
4R - 500 million years ago - the first chordates - chorodate.
4V - 400 million years ago - after plants, vertebrates "came out" literally and figuratively out of the water. 250 million years ago - 80-90 percent of species are extinct (Permian species extinction).
5R - 220 million years ago - the beginning of the reign of the dinosaurs.
5V - 65 million years ago - as a result of a meteorite hitting the Earth - the destruction of dinosaurs.
6R - About 65 - 30 million years ago - the development of herbivorous and carnivorous mammals.
6V - About 30 - 7 million years ago - Miocene Era - formation of most of the plants and animals known to us.
7R - About 12 million years ago - the appearance of the first primates hominids.
7V - About 7 - 5 million years ago - Human appearance - Anthropogenesis.
8R - About 100,000 years ago - the appearance of modern man.
8V - About 15-12 thousand. years ago - the prehistoric journeys of modern man - the Bering land "bridge".
9R - About 11.5K years ago - the end of the last glaciation.
9V - About 10,000 years ago - hunter-gatherers, the birth of agriculture.
10R - About 4000 B.C.E. - development of the Mesopotamian urban community.
10V - Around 3000 B.C.E. - the beginnings of ancient Egyptian civilization.
11R - The turn of the 2nd and 1st millennium BC - Judaism, Jerusalem.
11V - The turn of the century - Christianity. Rome.
12R - None. In my opinion - Ancient Greece.
12V - None. In my opinion - the Empire of Alexander of Macedon.
13R - Roman Empire.
13V - Persian Empire.
14R - Huns. Mongol Empire.
14V - Byzantine Empire.
15R - Frankish State. Carolingian Dynasty.
15V - Spread of Islam.
16R - Vikings.
16V - Slavs.
17R - Crusades.
17V - The Hundred Years' War.
18R - Ottoman Empire.
18V - The War of the Roses.
19R - Teutonic Order.
19V - Rus and the Duchy of Moscow.
20R - Habsburgs.
20V - Centenary of Discoveries.
21R - Jagiellons.
21V - Black slave trade.
22R - Russian Empire.
22V - China.
23R - Hohenzollerns.
23V - Holy Roman Empire.
24R - The Reformation.
24V - The Thirty Years' War.
25R - Wars with the Indians in North America.
25V - Bourbons. Louis XIV.
26R - The English Civil War.
26V - Battle of Vienna.
27R - Kingdom of Prussia.
27V - US War of Independence.
28R - Partitions of Poland.
28V - The Great French Revolution.
29R - Napoleon Bonaparte.
29V - Spring of Nations.
30R - The Civil War in the United States.
30V - World War I.
31R - October Revolution in Russia.
31V - Polish-Bolshevik War.
32R - Nazism.
32V - Hitler comes to power.
33R - The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.
33V - World War II (1939-1941).
34R - World War II (1942-1945).
34V - Iron Curtain.
35R - War in the Pacific.
35V - Eastern Europe after the war.
36R - De-Stalinization.
36V - Korean War.
37R - Uprisings in Eastern Europe.
37V - Desegregation. Martin Luther King.
38R - Cuba. Bay of Pigs Invasion.
38V - Vietnam War.
39R - Prague Spring.
39V - Israeli - Arab conflict.
40R - Iranian Islamic Revolution.
40V - Afghan War.
41R - Polish August 1980.
41V - Iran-Iraq War.
42R - Eagles Claw Operation.
42V - Martial law in Poland.
43R - Autumn of Nations in Central and Eastern Europe.
43V - Breakup of Yugoslavia.
44R - Creation of the European Union.
44V - The attack on the World Trade Center.
45R - Caucasus.
45V - Enlargement of the European Union - The Treaty of Athens.
46R - Financial crisis.
46V - Gloria Olivae.
47R – Syrian civil war.
47V – Ukraine.
48R – Migration crisis in Europe.
48V – Debt crisis in the Eurozone.
49R – Arab Spring.
49V – Islamic State.
50R – Pandemic.
50V – Brexit, Scottish Secession.
51R – Putin.
51V – Another murderous splash of blood.
|
|
|
|
| Część historyczna Manuskryptu Voynicha zawiera informacje o ziołach. |
|
Posted by: Gregor - 18-04-2025, 08:31 AM - Forum: Imagery
- Replies (1)
|
|
<!-- @strona { rozmiar: 21cm 29,7cm; marginesy: 2cm } P { margines-dolny: 0,21cm } -->
Manuskrypt Voynicha (jego część) jest swoim rodzajem kompendium wiedzy o naszej Historii, w ujawnieniu pojęcia aluminiowa płyta pokryta kryptowaluta złota, która została wysłana w kosmos w latach 70. XX wieku na pierwszym sondzie powstaniaj Pioneer 10.
Moja propozycja rozszyfrowania Manuskryptu Voynicha jest taka, że każda z jego stron koduje inne informacje.
Szyfrowanie nie polega wyłącznie na formie podstawowej. Dotyczy to również całego spektrum informacji, które wynikają z możliwości zakodowania w innych formach – np. za pomocą znaków i symboli: patrz semiotyka – z greckiego: „semasticos” – znaczenie, „semasia” – znaczenie”, „semeion” – znak od „sema” – znak, obraz, sygnał.
Ja też zakodowany jest Manuskrypt Voynicha. Moim zdaniem nie jest to klasyczny klasyczny pisany, lecz symboliczny rebus – ideogram.
Manuskrypt Voynicha, aw jego części zielonej, jest moim problemem swoistym kompendium wiedzy o Ewolucji Życia na Ziemi – udostępnienie od jej aspektu kosmologicznego, poprzez ewolucję człowieka (teorię Darwina), aż po prehistorię, a także historię współtowarzysza.
W głównej części części zielonej jego autor zakodował wszystkie najważniejsze wydarzenia z naszej powszechnej historii z taką samą, że nieeden podręcznik historii mógłby mu pozazdrościć. Co więcej, zakodowane ilustracje Manuskryptu przedstawiają także wydarzenia aktualne, jak również te, których świadkami jesteśmy dopiero w przyszłości!
Rozważając symboliczne ilustracje Manuskryptu Voynicha w jego części ziołowej, należy zwrócić uwagę na poszczególne elementy charakterystyczne: korzeń, łodygę, liść, a także kwiat. Wszystkie elementy wyposażenia zawierają zakodowaną informację.
Poniżej, dla lepszego zobrazowania kontinuum czasowo-historycznego w telegraficznym skrócie, podsumowanie szczegółowej ilustracji Manuskryptu Voynicha (od 1R do 51V).
Manuskrypt Voynicha - część ziołowa (historyczna).
1R - Wielki Wybuch i Kolaps - cykliczna natura zamknięta.
1V - Około 4,5 - 5 miliardów lat temu - Układ Słoneczny powstał z obłoku gazu i pyłu.
2R - Około 3,5 miliarda lat temu - powstające pierwsze organizmy - bakterie.
2V - Około miliarda lat temu pierwsze organizmy jednokomórkowe (eukarioty).
3R - Około 900 - 700 milionów lat temu - pierwsze organizmy wielokomórkowe.
3V - Około 700 - 600 milionów lat temu - pierwsze bezkręgowce.
4R - 500 milionów lat temu - pierwsze strowce - chorodate.
4V - 400 milionów lat temu - po roślinach, z wody pitnej iw przenośni „wyłączne” kręgowce. 250 milionów lat temu - wyginęło 80-90 procent gatunków (permskie wymieranie gatunków).
5R - 220 milionów lat temu - początek panowania dinozaurów.
5V - 65 milionów lat temu - w wyniku uderzenia meteorytu w Ziemię - zagłada dinozaurów.
6R - Około 65 – 30 milionów lat temu – rozwój ssaków roślinożernych i mięsożernych.
6V - Około 30 - 7 milionów lat temu - miocen - powstała większość znanych nam roślin i zwierząt.
7R - Około 12 milionów lat temu - pojawienie się pierwszych naczelnych – człowiekowatych.
7V - Około 7-5 milionów lat temu - Pojawienie się człowieka - Antropogeneza.
8R - Około 100 000 lat temu - pojawienie się współczesnego człowieka.
8V - Około 15-12 tys. lat temu - pradziejowe podróże współczesnego człowieka - „most” na lądzie Beringa.
9R - Około 11,5 tys. lat temu - koniec ostatniego zlodowacenia.
9V – Około 10 000 lat temu – łowcy-zbieracze, narodziny rolnictwa.
10R - Około 4000 p.n.e. – rozwój społeczności miejskiej Mezopotamii.
10V - Około 3000 r. p.n.e. - początki starożytnej cywilizacji egipskiej.
11R - Przełom II i I tysiąclecia p.n.e. - Judaizm, Jerozolima.
11V - Przełom wieków - Chrześcijaństwo. Rzym.
12R - Brak. Moim zdaniem - Starożytna Grecja.
12V - Brak. Moim zdaniem - Imperium Aleksandra Macedońskiego.
13R - Cesarstwo Rzymskie.
13V - Imperium Perskie.
14R - Hunowie. Imperium mongolskie.
14V - Cesarstwo Bizantyjskie.
15R - Państwo Franków. Dynastia Karolingów.
15V - Rozprzestrzenianie się islamu.
16R - Wikingowie.
16V - Słowianie.
17R - Krucjaty.
17V - Wojna stuletnia.
18R - Imperium Osmańskie.
18V - Wojna Dwóch Róż.
19R - Zakon Krzyżacki.
19V - Ruś i Księstwo Moskiewskie.
20R - Habsburgowie.
20V - Stulecie odkryć.
21R - Jagiellonowie.
21V - Handel czarnymi niewolnikami.
22R - Imperium Rosyjskie.
22V - Chiny.
23R - Hohenzollernowie.
23V - Święte Cesarstwo Rzymskie.
24R - Reformacja.
24V - Wojna trzydziestoletnia.
25R - Wojny z Indianami w Ameryce Północnej.
25V - Burbonowie. Ludwik XIV.
26R - Wojna domowa w Anglii.
26V - Bitwa pod Wiedniem.
27R - Królestwo Prus.
27V - Wojna o niepodległość Stanów Zjednoczonych.
28R - Rozbiory Polski.
28V - Wielka Rewolucja Francuska.
29R - Napoleon Bonaparte.
29V - Wiosna Ludów.
30R - Wojna secesyjna w Stanach Zjednoczonych.
30V - I wojna światowa.
31R - Rewolucja październikowa w Rosji.
31V - Wojna polsko-bolszewicka.
32R - Nazizm.
32V - Hitler dochodzi do władzy.
33R - Pakt Ribbentrop-Mołotow.
33V - II wojna światowa (1939-1941).
34R - II wojna światowa (1942-1945).
34V - Żelazna kurtyna.
35R - Wojna na Pacyfiku.
35V - Europa Wschodnia po wojnie.
36R - Destalinizacja.
36V - Wojna koreańska.
37R - Powstania w Europie Wschodniej.
37V - Desegregacja. Martin Luther King.
38R - Kuba. Inwazja w Zatoce Świń.
38V - Wojna w Wietnamie.
39R - Praska Wiosna.
39V - Konflikt izraelsko-arabski.
40R - Irańska rewolucja islamska.
40V - Wojna w Afganistanie.
41R - Polski sierpień 1980.
41V - Wojna iracko-irańska.
42R - Operacja Orli Pazur.
42V - Stan wojenny w Polsce.
43R - Jesień Narodów w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej.
43V - Rozpad Jugosławii.
44R - Powstanie Unii Europejskiej.
44V – Atak na World Trade Center.
45R - Kaukaz.
45V - Rozszerzenie Unii Europejskiej - Traktat Ateński.
46R - Kryzys finansowy.
46V - Piękna i Bestia.
47R – Wojna domowa w Syrii.
47V – Ukraina.
48R – Kryzys migracyjny w Europie.
48V – Kryzys stosowania w strefie euro.
49R – Arabska Wiosna.
49V – Państwo Islamskie.
50R – Pandemia.
50V – Brexit, secesja Szkocji.
51R – Putin.
51V – Kolejny morderczy rozprysk krwi.
|
|
|
|
| Polyphonic Cipher? |
|
Posted by: Dobri - 17-04-2025, 08:25 AM - Forum: Analysis of the text
- Replies (5)
|
|
What if the cipher manuscript is encoded with some kind of a polyphonic cipher, a precursor to ciphers of this kind which were developed starting from the second half of the 15th century?
For starters, let me list some clues pointing in this direction:
- excessive use of the symbol o;
- seemingly "predictable" content;
- low entropy;
etc.
Perhaps the benched diacritical marks could be used to switch from one encoding mode to another?
|
|
|
|
|
