Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Online Users |
There are currently 70 online users. » 2 Member(s) | 66 Guest(s) Applebot, Bing
|
Latest Threads |
New Post: "I Do Listen to...
Forum: News
Last Post: asteckley
1 hour ago
» Replies: 125
» Views: 6,201
|
Paths to Decipherment
Forum: Voynich Talk
Last Post: R. Sale
7 hours ago
» Replies: 3
» Views: 105
|
The Voynich Manuscript, D...
Forum: News
Last Post: bi3mw
Yesterday, 06:41 PM
» Replies: 16
» Views: 597
|
Planning for Voynich Manu...
Forum: Voynich Talk
Last Post: Lissu
Yesterday, 04:29 PM
» Replies: 30
» Views: 2,279
|
Medieval Manuscripts with...
Forum: Physical material
Last Post: Koen G
Yesterday, 03:52 PM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 3,906
|
Voynich Talk Episode 1, p...
Forum: News
Last Post: Koen G
Yesterday, 01:45 PM
» Replies: 17
» Views: 520
|
Expert Opinion
Forum: Voynich Talk
Last Post: Mark Knowles
18-04-2024, 02:16 PM
» Replies: 45
» Views: 1,824
|
Calgary engineer believes...
Forum: Analysis of the text
Last Post: Ahmet Ardıç
18-04-2024, 08:23 AM
» Replies: 479
» Views: 105,791
|
Voynichese Cryptography
Forum: News
Last Post: asteckley
17-04-2024, 03:18 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 91
|
F66r question
Forum: Analysis of the text
Last Post: Aga Tentakulus
17-04-2024, 04:43 AM
» Replies: 100
» Views: 18,398
|
|
|
[split] VMS - a forgery? |
Posted by: bunny - 14-12-2016, 08:31 AM - Forum: Analysis of the text
- Replies (13)
|
|
(14-12-2016, 06:24 AM)-JKP- Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.[quote pid='9755' dateline='1481674532']
That's modern English. They didn't speak or spell English like this in the 15th century.
If you change even one letter, then the gematria number of the word changes and no longer matches the same word in Stellar's system.
For example, I've seen the word "money" in 16th-century documents, but only rarely and I haven't seen it in any 15th-century documents. It's a French word (and spelled variously), not English and certainly not spelled "money". In those days, they usually spoke of silver or ducats or pence or specific quantities rather than using a general term like "money".
Changing it to French spelling completely changes the gematria value, which means it wouldn't apply to the VMS word. Same with many of the other "decoded" words.
[/quote]
There is nothing that suggests to me it is factually a C15th manuscript in content and the language would be more modern. Of all the languages people have looked at in modern times they do seem to find contemporaneous word structure, again something I will be looking at in my hypothesis.
Bunny
|
|
|
The nimph with tongs? pincers? (f80r) |
Posted by: Searcher - 14-12-2016, 12:33 AM - Forum: Imagery
- Replies (46)
|
|
Description:
This nymph is the second figure in the central "canal" in the image on the f80r. Standing (going) in the water (or some liquid), she is dressed in the transparent (wet?) skirt, she holds some object in her hand, which looks similar to tongs or pincers.
In this thread, I want to make a list of possible interpretations concerning the instrument and this person, in general.
One or a few men made a supposition that this nymph may represent a woman in childbirth, and the tool in her hand is an obstetric forceps (after the second part of 16 c.). Another thought was made that this thing and the nymph could have some allegorical meaning.
I also have a few suppositions as for this item. Let's begin from the "transparent skirt". I think it depicts a bathing clothes, just wet.
For example, as in bathing of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Now, about the thing similar to You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. or pincers. There are quite many kinds of tongs: blacksmith's tongs for coal (fireplace tongs, fire-tongs), goldsmith's tongs, dental tongs, ice tongs, etc.
Tongs themselves are very old instrument:
1). Ancient Greek: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view..
HEPHAISTOS (Hephaestus) was the Olympian god of fire, smiths, craftsmen, metalworking, stonemasonry and sculpture. He was depicted as a bearded man holding a hammer and tongs - the tools of a smith, and, sometimes, riding a donkey.
2).The Bible:
Isaiah 6:6 "Then one of the seraphim flew to me with a live coal in his hand, which he had taken with tongs from the altar."
3). Pirkei Avot:
"According to Pirkei Avot, a classical Jewish text of the third century of the common era, the first pair of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. were created by God right before God rested in the Seventh Day. The reasoning is that a blacksmith must use a pair of tongs in order to fashion a brand new pair of tongs. Accordingly, God must have provided humankind with the first pair of tongs."
Pirkei Avot, chapter 5, mishnah 6 says:
Quote:Ten things were created at twilight of Shabbat eve. These are: the mouth of the earth [that swallowed Korach]; the mouth of [Miriam's] well; the mouth of [Balaam's] ass; the rainbow; the manna; [Moses'] staff; the shamir; the writing, the inscription and the tablets [of the Ten Commandments]. Some say also the burial place of Moses and the ram of our father Abraham. And some say also the spirits of destruction as well as the original tongs, for tongs are made with tongs.
4).You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
5). Alchemists (women and men) with tongs on images, 16c.:
Anna Maria Zieglerin (ca. 1550–1575)
A few versions representing alchemy.
Alchemist's instruments:
6). You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and the devil.
7). You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
8). Use in tortures (without images )
In conclusion: Most likely, men don't fit this story. A woman with obstetric forceps can be worthy of note, if the VMs is a work written not earlier, than in the second part of the 16 century. On the other side, people, including alchemists, used fire-tongs from the earliest times, bathing (canals, liquids, lakes) in this case can mean You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., for example.
|
|
|
Which changes to EVA would have the most impact? |
Posted by: Koen G - 11-12-2016, 09:17 PM - Forum: Analysis of the text
- Replies (13)
|
|
I think this is a very important question that might illuminate some things, yet I'm not sure if there is any answer readily available.
The question has been purposefully phrased in terms of "most impact" because I'm not primarily interested in rare characters and other freak occurrences, but rather differences that might affect entropy (thanks Anton) and similar properties.
I believe the alterations would mostly be to read as two separate glyphs something which in EVA is transcribed as one.
Perhaps the most obvious example is the different kinds of "caps" on the bench. I would try to distinguish there between the floater and the toucher.
But when I look at other glyphs, I also see significant variation, especially in the "tilt", for example in l and d. But those seem harder to tell apart.
What is your opinion? And is there a way we could test whether a split is meaningful?
|
|
|
Discussion of the Konstellations |
Posted by: Koen G - 08-12-2016, 09:10 PM - Forum: Imagery
- Replies (92)
|
|
I have been studying Quire 13 for many months now, and have written quite a lot about it. I thought it would be a good idea to make a thread where I can share the results of my analyses. And hopefully discuss your comments, questions, criticisms or additional ideas.
I decided to do my own "Jackson sequence" and call these things Konstellations because my name starts with a K. There is a good reason to not call them "constellations" because they diverge from standard depictions in a relatively consistent way.
What?
A Konstellation is two things at once, a synthesis of:
- A scene in an Ovidian myth, part of a narrative sequence that spans one or two pages.
- A depiction of an Aratean constellation.
I use Ovidian and Aratean in the sense "like Ovid" and "like Aratus". I am not certain that these specific authors were the actual sources.
Why?
I don't know - we will only be sure when we can read the text. It is known that myth and constellations have had a symbiotic relationship since times immemorial, and they were often transmitted together. See for example the Aratea tradition and the works of popular authors like Ovid and Hyginus. We also know that quite a number of Roman authors, like Cicero, made (creative) translations of Aratus' poem. The translation of Greek astronomical works was seen as a rite of passage or a matter of prestige, and many of these works survived into the middel ages, where they were translated and/or adapted again. We also know that many works have been lost.
All I know is that likely the VM images emerged from this fertile soil which, during many centuries, inspired men to write about stars and myths. It is no wonder that many Hellenistic myths were catasterisms, myths explaining the origins of constellations.
Obviously, the Voynich is different than anything we know. Whether that is because we are witnessing the last survivor of a lost tradition or an individual's creative effort is beside the point here - both remain possible, given the right source texts.
Where?
Konstellations are only found in a subset of Quire 13 folios. This subset has been distinguished by a number of previous researchers: Claston, Pelling, VViews...
The folios are: 76(v), 77, 79, 80, 82, 83. The direction of the stories is almost always right to left (!). From this subset, I am not certain whether 77, 82 and 83 follow the exact same pattern, so I will not discuss them here. That leaves five folios as the subject of this thread: 76v, 79r, 79v, 80r, 80v. The arrangement of the bifolios allows for the option that these pages were once grouped, though this is not strictly a prerequisite.
Overview
These are the stories I have analyzed in depth so far:- f79r Ceyx and Alcyone: Ceyx' ship is destroyed in a storm, Iris is sent to the realm of Sleep, Morpheus tells Alcyone the news that her husband is dead.
- f79v Scylla and Glaucus: Glaucus, a "merman", is in love with Scylla. He asks the witch Circe for a love potion. Circe is jealous and turns Scylla into a monster/rock instead.
- f80r Philomela (part 1)
- f76v Philomela (part 2)
- f80v Callisto
UPDATE 11 Dec 2016. Virgo moved to f80r, Leo and Taurus added, Cancer removed.
I am fairly certain (90%) about the following constellations so far. I do not include those with less certainty yet:- f76v Ara, Engonasin (Hercules), Lyra, Cygnus, Equus. Scorpio's tail is hinted at above Ara.
- f79r Perseus, Aries, Auriga, Gemini, Libra, Ophiuchus. Also both Equinoxes are marked. Locations of in-between constellations are marked with dots but not depicted.
- f79v Argo Navis, Piscis Austrinus, Triangulum, Delphinus, Sagitta
- f80r Scorpio, Pisces, Virgo, Aquarius, Leo, Taurus
- f80v Ursa Minor, Ursa Major, Draco, Bootes, Orion, Cetus, Lepus, Canis, Corvus-Hydra-Crater
Additionally, it seems clear that Cepheus, Cassiopeia and Andromeda are on top of f77v, but I don't understand much else from this folio yet.
The analysis of each Konstellation requires consulting primary sources. Those who collected myths, like Ovid and Hyginus, and those who described the constellations and their relative positions, like Aratus and Manilius. And many constellation manuscripts, like Aratus Latinus. These findings are not the result of free association, but of many hours of work. Fun, but work nonetheless.
The difficulty of communicating these findings is that - as is so often the case in Voynich studies - there is no complete visual parallel. I hope that by presenting the Konstellations in this thread, you will get an idea of the degree of consistency and the scope of this brilliant synthesis. With each discovery, my admiration for the person who made this has grown. It is like a dense poem, where each line says many things at once. Only, this is a poem of myths and constellation images.
Some of the earlier analyses on my blog have been made in the early stages, and they don't always reflect what I know now. For the time being, I would like to refer to my most recent posts, which analyze the constellation level of f79r in detail, and with a more mature understanding of the imagery.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
I will add individual examples to this thread in the next days, but for now this general introduction will do. I will of course gladly answer any questions or remarks already.
|
|
|
Plant in f7v 'has dots on its leaves' |
Posted by: Karenina - 03-12-2016, 07:50 PM - Forum: Imagery
- Replies (15)
|
|
About the plant in f7v: it struck me that it has a single dot on each of its leaves. I thought this might be an abstraction, and signify 'has dots on its leaves'.
In that case this plant could for instance be Lungwort (Pulmonaria officinalis), which has dotted leaves, little flowers, and belongs to the Boraginaceae, which in general have hairy leaves .
See pictures: Lungwort (Pulmonaria) in photo, in You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. MS Egerton 747 (Nicolaus of Salerno, Tractatus de herbis , c.1280-1310), and in Giorgio Bonelli’s, Hortus romanus, vol. 2, Rome, 1774, tab. 27.
Pulmonaria officinalis.jpg (Size: 27.3 KB / Downloads: 157)
lungwort-egerton-747p1.jpg (Size: 83.67 KB / Downloads: 159)
Pulmonaria Italorum.jpg (Size: 57.17 KB / Downloads: 161)
Is anyone aware of similar abstractions in representation in other herbal manuscripts of that time?
If was wondering if perhaps the 'image language' in the herbal section could be in general more abstract than one would expect.
|
|
|
The claimed Voynich page |
Posted by: -JKP- - 02-12-2016, 03:36 PM - Forum: Imagery
- Replies (7)
|
|
Unfortunately, I didn't download the image and I didn't bookmark the page, but ReneZ uploaded an interesting mention some months ago of a "Voynich page" which the owner feels is authentic (or authentically old, I can't remember which)—of one of the large-plant drawings.
The instant I saw it, it was obvious to me that it was not drawn by the Voynich illustrator and the person who had copied the text didn't fully understand Voynichese glyph forms, so I basically forgot about it until a few minutes ago when it suddenly hit me why there was something eerily familiar about it. I can't find the original picture anywhere on the Net so I can't compare them to check if I remember it correctly, but it struck me that it is similar to a specific style and so perhaps was done around the same time. Maybe it's one of the drawings that was copied and sent to one of the potential decipherers, since most of the owners of the VMS were reluctant to let the original out of their hands.
If so, then it would definitely form part of the provenance of the manuscript.
Does anyone know if there's still a link to the pic on the Web?
|
|
|
|