Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Latest Threads |
Historical ciphers, when ...
Forum: Analysis of the text
Last Post: Koen G
11 minutes ago
» Replies: 8
» Views: 102
|
An attempt at extracting ...
Forum: Analysis of the text
Last Post: davidd
38 minutes ago
» Replies: 18
» Views: 497
|
Histocrypt 2025
Forum: News
Last Post: Mark Knowles
6 hours ago
» Replies: 1
» Views: 85
|
Special "nymphs" around G...
Forum: Imagery
Last Post: Koen G
Today, 06:52 AM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 98
|
Transliteration-related i...
Forum: Analysis of the text
Last Post: ReneZ
Today, 03:57 AM
» Replies: 35
» Views: 13,505
|
Getting close to a source...
Forum: Imagery
Last Post: R. Sale
Yesterday, 08:48 PM
» Replies: 180
» Views: 17,267
|
Generally about proposed ...
Forum: Analysis of the text
Last Post: Ruby Novacna
Yesterday, 06:04 PM
» Replies: 31
» Views: 2,673
|
Upcoming Voynich program ...
Forum: News
Last Post: Koen G
Yesterday, 02:07 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 145
|
f25v - Corn Plant (Dracae...
Forum: Imagery
Last Post: Dobri
18-05-2025, 04:05 AM
» Replies: 13
» Views: 950
|
Partial Deciphering of th...
Forum: Voynich Talk
Last Post: Bluetoes101
17-05-2025, 11:17 PM
» Replies: 22
» Views: 1,245
|
|
|
List of "weird" vords |
Posted by: Rafal - 05-03-2025, 08:58 PM - Forum: Analysis of the text
- Replies (11)
|
 |
I wonder, did anybody tried to make a list of "weird" or "rare" Voynich vords?
Mosts of vords are very regular and schematic but there are exceptions which are not so common but not so rare as well.
It's probably about 1-5% of words but it's just my guess.
What is a "weird" vord is subjective but I'll give you some examples from page f116r:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
- llory: double "l" is rare and weird
- amom: "m" in the word middle is rare
- ykoloin: bench made of "y" and "o" is rare
- qo: "qo" alone is rare
- raiin: vord starting with "r" is weird
- chll: double "l" is maybe not so rare but still feels weird
As I said its subjective and you may agree or not with me that these vords don't fit the grand scheme.
But is there any subjective collection of such vords made by someone, possibly with explanation why there were "weird" to him?
|
|
|
Lingua Volgare Shorthand |
Posted by: ginocaspari - 02-03-2025, 11:33 AM - Forum: News
- Replies (54)
|
 |
Dear Forum Users,
we have recently elaborated on a possible solution proposing lingua volgare written in shorthand. The preprint has been posted on SocArXiv.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
The Supplementary Information can be found here:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
We are looking for specialists in lingua volgare shorthand to replicate our solution and mitigate our confirmation bias. In our humble opinion, the difficulty of Voynich lies in the layered nature of the problem. We propose that the Voynich is a single substitution cipher applied to a medieval shorthand. The single substitution cipher is algorithmic and reproducible. However, the underlying text is written in shorthand and this is the real issue. Lingua volgare shorthand texts are notoriously ambiguous and even with proper language knowledge, they can remain hard to understand. The shorthand nature of the text is also why the Voynich exhibits such strange statistical properties (namely the low entropy of bigrams). Again, it is crucial to understand that a shorthand displays very different statistical properties in comparison to its source language.
We address the entropy problem in a longer explanatory text and we also identify grammatical material. We have reached out to specialists in lingua volgare shorthand personally, in order to allow for a replication by someone other than the authors (Caspari & Faccini). But of course we very much appreciate attempts by lingua volgare experts outside our immediate circle. The explanatory text can be found in the supplementary information section. We use seven criteria established by Prof. Claire Bowern to guide our argument.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Furthermore, we provide a list of 400+ words which can be read in lingua volgare. The words form part of a consistent vocabulary featuring a plethora of terms related to plants and horticulture. All words can be found in the texts of authors roughly contemporary with the creation of the Voynich. Each word in the list of the supplementary information is joined by a remark and context of the word in a source of the time. Often the example sentences feature additional words we also read from the Voynich. Here is the link to the vocabulary list (for convenience we have also supplied PDF files of the same list separated into vocabulary and comments):
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Our proposed solution also identifies agglutinating characteristics of the Voynich including the identification of relative pronouns and articles which we find are key to understanding the mechanisms behind the text's creation. This phenomenon finds frequent correspondences in the lingua volgare manuscripts of the time.
We look forward to constructive criticism and a well-informed discussion.
Sincerely,
Gino Caspari & Agnese Faccini
|
|
|
Full Voynich Solution -- Deceptive Fundraising |
Posted by: asteckley - 01-03-2025, 03:08 PM - Forum: News
- Replies (19)
|
 |
A new Voynich "solution" has just been posted on a Facebook group "Decoding The Voynich Manuscript".
It is presented as a complete decoding and accompanying description of the entire Voynich Manuscript produced by a large language model. As a data scientist and research engineer who has worked with and developed these AI models, I can assure all that the solution is complete nonsense. To the extent any of it might be "accurate", it will be a hallucinagenic compilation of the hundreds of observations extracted from all the Voynich enthusiasts' written claims in blog, posts, and books.
There is certainly nothing wrong with producing and publishing the kind of document that he has done-- the document is fun to read and is really very entertaining. And it is obvious that his solution does not match the contents of the manuscript.
HOWEVER, he has also posted a GoFundMe page to raise funds.
I believe this "crosses the line". (He actually dares to say "
No scams here, just a dream to expand".)
Many people, hopeful about these kinds of solutions to the Voynich, may not recognize that the claims within the document are technical nonsense and that it is describing "research" that never really took place. They may believe that the "further work" that he is wanting funds for has some legitimacy and hope.
Hopefully, this will be recognized and reported to GoFundMe.
His document:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
His GoFundMe page:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
|
|
|
AN OPTICAL APPROACH FOR DECODING THE MYSTERIOUS VOYNICH MANUSCRIPT |
Posted by: Scarecrow - 25-02-2025, 07:28 PM - Forum: Voynich Talk
- Replies (3)
|
 |
A novel (?) approach from Bucharest university reseacher Costin-Anton-Boiangiu et.al.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
The current paper presents several optical approaches used for investigating the decoding of the Voynich Manuscript. Over the past century, there have been numerous decipherment claims, but none of them can be accepted as the true solution. Most of them focus on the syntax analysis of the text, trying to correlate the Voynich text with well-known languages. In the current paper, we present a short history and description of the manuscript, as well as an innovative technique used for attempting its decoding. Our paper presents the use of several optical approaches, such as various distortions, words and character scrambling, in the attempt of correctly identifying voynichese words with the help of OCR
|
|
|
Words get more unusual as they get longer (from 2 characters) |
Posted by: Addsamuels - 22-02-2025, 06:33 PM - Forum: Analysis of the text
- Replies (5)
|
 |
Jacquard Similarity
===For 1-grams
Average 1-gram similarity among least common words: 0.25570049296453057
Average 1-gram similarity among most common words: 0.21682838534999466
===For 2-grams
Average 2-gram similarity among least common words: 0.06423834336923202
Average 2-gram similarity among most common words: 0.06670467758507431
===For 3-grams
Average 3-gram similarity among least common words: 0.016802481467017006
Average 3-gram similarity among most common words: 0.02217942907311669
===For 4-grams
Average 4-gram similarity among least common words: 0.004504037054205818
Average 4-gram similarity among most common words: 0.007278612262000938
===For 5-grams
Average 5-gram similarity among least common words: 0.000987486273694194
Average 5-gram similarity among most common words: 0.0019374143958861578
===For 6-grams
Average 6-gram similarity among least common words: 0.0002422555676235787
Average 6-gram similarity among most common words: 0.0003965759779713268
Levenshtein Similarity
Length 2:
Overall average Levenshtein distance: 1.8191
Least common words: (freq = 2) -> Avg distance: 1.8333
Top 40 most common words: -> Avg distance: 1.8115
Top 10 most common words: -> Avg distance: 1.7778
Length 3:
Overall average Levenshtein distance: 2.6262
Least common words: (freq = 2) -> Avg distance: 2.6473
Top 40 most common words: -> Avg distance: 2.4744
Top 10 most common words: -> Avg distance: 2.4667
Length 4:
Overall average Levenshtein distance: 3.4458
Least common words: (freq = 2) -> Avg distance: 3.5212
Top 40 most common words: -> Avg distance: 3.2308
Top 10 most common words: -> Avg distance: 3.1556
Length 5:
Overall average Levenshtein distance: 4.1917
Least common words: (freq = 2) -> Avg distance: 4.2958
Top 40 most common words: -> Avg distance: 3.8141
Top 10 most common words: -> Avg distance: 3.8667
Length 6:
Overall average Levenshtein distance: 4.8464
Least common words: (freq = 2) -> Avg distance: 4.9734
Top 40 most common words: -> Avg distance: 4.3154
Top 10 most common words: -> Avg distance: 3.9778
Length 7:
Overall average Levenshtein distance: 5.4544
Least common words: (freq = 2) -> Avg distance: 5.6087
Top 40 most common words: -> Avg distance: 4.7000
Top 10 most common words: -> Avg distance: 4.5333
Length 8:
Overall average Levenshtein distance: 5.9280
Least common words: (freq = 2) -> Avg distance: 6.1097
Top 40 most common words: -> Avg distance: 5.3397
Top 10 most common words: -> Avg distance: 5.1333
N.B: Ignored hapax legomena
Note this is consistent with natural languages but I believe it is more common in the Voynich
|
|
|
|