ololololo > 18-08-2026, 11:23 PM

eggyk > 19-08-2026, 12:48 AM
(18-08-2026, 11:23 PM)ololololo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.If anything, I’m responding to @eggyk. The quick reply function is gone somewhere, and I’m too lazy to copy the template right now.
You’re saying that k = m (in the sense that they’re similar), and m = μ (in the sense that they’re similar in sound), then k = μ
(18-08-2026, 11:23 PM)ololololo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.One way or another, you equate the letters VMS with their Greek counterparts through correspondence with Latin letters. This doesn’t work... In the case of Voynichese, that’s for sure.
Oscroft > 19-08-2026, 10:13 AM
(18-08-2026, 10:53 PM)eggyk Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The assertion is that EVA "k" looks like latin "m" somehow. Then, seperately, that a latin "m" corresponds to the same sound as greek μ. Therefore, whether EVA "k" looks like μ or not is irrelevant to the point.
I wasn't saying that's a fact, I was saying that is the assertion.
ololololo > 19-08-2026, 10:16 AM
), but Latin can also be confidently equated with the Cyrillic alphabet, and it can be proven that VMS is written in Proto‑Slavic. Equalization alone is not enough.
Oscroft > 19-08-2026, 12:53 PM
(19-08-2026, 10:16 AM)ololololo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.It’s possible to equate Latin letters with Greek ones (and my nickname can be written that way too), but Latin can also be confidently equated with the Cyrillic alphabet...
Ruby Novacna > 19-08-2026, 02:48 PM
(19-08-2026, 12:53 PM)Oscroft Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.And the key point behind all of this is that comparisons with real-world letters can only make sense comparing the original Voynichese letters themselves... not with EVA or any other intermediate codification.
Oscroft > 19-08-2026, 04:42 PM
(19-08-2026, 02:48 PM)Ruby Novacna Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(19-08-2026, 12:53 PM)Oscroft Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.And the key point behind all of this is that comparisons with real-world letters can only make sense comparing the original Voynichese letters themselves... not with EVA or any other intermediate codification.
And what exactly do you mean by "original Voynichese letters"?
Ruby Novacna > 19-08-2026, 06:21 PM
(19-08-2026, 04:42 PM)Oscroft Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(19-08-2026, 02:48 PM)Ruby Novacna Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(19-08-2026, 12:53 PM)Oscroft Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.And the key point behind all of this is that comparisons with real-world letters can only make sense comparing the original Voynichese letters themselves... not with EVA or any other intermediate codification.
And what exactly do you mean by "original Voynichese letters"?
The letters written on the Voynich manuscript.
Oscroft > 19-08-2026, 09:03 PM
(19-08-2026, 06:21 PM)Ruby Novacna Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The "letters" of the manuscript have been given nicknames by the transliterators. Furthermore, EVA is not the only alphabet used for transliterating the VM.
If you want to know what the letter in the manuscript, nicknamed "k" in EVA, looks like, it's very easy: the transliteration file, available online, will guide you.
Then, it's up to you to decide what name you will give this "letter."
Is it a letter, a syllable, a numeral, a scientific symbol?
The choice is yours.
Ruby Novacna > 19-08-2026, 10:41 PM
(19-08-2026, 09:03 PM)Oscroft Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I'm not interested in arguing with you. I've tried to explain a fundamental mistake you are making. But if you can't understand, or don't want to know, I'm sorry but I can offer no further help.