| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Online Users |
There are currently 921 online users.
» 4 Member(s) | 915 Guest(s)
Bing, Google, Lissu, Typpi
|
| Latest Threads |
Elephant in the Room Solu...
Forum: Theories & Solutions
Last Post: Jorge_Stolfi
59 minutes ago
» Replies: 91
» Views: 5,107
|
AI-generated "Voynich man...
Forum: Fiction, Comics, Films & Videos, Games & other Media
Last Post: Aga Tentakulus
1 hour ago
» Replies: 110
» Views: 49,863
|
A random rant about the V...
Forum: Voynich Talk
Last Post: MHTamdgidi_(Behrooz)
2 hours ago
» Replies: 2
» Views: 99
|
“The Library of Babel” by...
Forum: Fiction, Comics, Films & Videos, Games & other Media
Last Post: ReneZ
8 hours ago
» Replies: 8
» Views: 306
|
Would a NEW Voynich Manus...
Forum: Provenance & history
Last Post: Bluetoes101
9 hours ago
» Replies: 30
» Views: 846
|
On the word "luez" in the...
Forum: Marginalia
Last Post: JoJo_Jost
11 hours ago
» Replies: 7
» Views: 197
|
The Modern Forgery Hypoth...
Forum: Theories & Solutions
Last Post: R. Sale
Yesterday, 07:50 PM
» Replies: 381
» Views: 35,445
|
Three arguments in favor ...
Forum: Theories & Solutions
Last Post: JustAnotherTheory
Yesterday, 06:04 PM
» Replies: 13
» Views: 842
|
I found "michiton" in a 1...
Forum: Marginalia
Last Post: JustAnotherTheory
Yesterday, 11:58 AM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 222
|
I've never seen anyone ta...
Forum: Marginalia
Last Post: LisaFaginDavis
15-01-2026, 10:15 PM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 195
|
|
|
| Podcast |
|
Posted by: LisaFaginDavis - 20-11-2024, 06:56 PM - Forum: News
- Replies (3)
|
 |
The latest episode of the "This is Love" podcast is devoted to the VMS, featuring myself, Claire Bowern, Cary Rapaport, and Koen Gheuens:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
|
|
|
| New video: "Is the Voynich Manuscript fake?" |
|
Posted by: Koen G - 19-11-2024, 11:38 PM - Forum: Voynich Talk
- Replies (84)
|
 |
I finally finished my new video. This one is about fraud, forgery and fakery of all kinds. Meaning, lack of meaning, good intentions, bad intentions, John Dee, Wilfrid Voynich or the Crossbowman.
This video is the one that took me the longest to make so far. It includes both known and new research and highlights some lesser known aspects as well. As usual, I tried to learn some new animations along the way, and attempted to keep it visually interesting.
I owe thanks to Lisa, Rene and Marco for their input and factchecking of the script, and to Cary for reviewing the video before publication.
I also provided English subtitles, which should make it a bit easier to watch for those who like them.
Enjoy!
|
|
|
|
| Why create such a complex cipher? |
|
Posted by: addekallstrom - 17-11-2024, 04:07 PM - Forum: Analysis of the text
- Replies (26)
|
 |
Hi!
I was listening to another video about the manuscript today and in the QnA section, someone asked: "What motivations would there be for creating it as a hoax with random gibberish?"
I wasn't too impressed with the answer, and instead it got me thinking the complete opposite way: If you are writing a book on [botany/women's health/astronomy/etc] and you want to encode it, why create such an incredibly difficult to crack cipher?
As I was thinking about this, I was reminded of the Zodiac ciphers from the 1970s. I'm sure most cipher nerds know that the Z-340 was cracked about four years ago now. It was cracked through a computer brute forcing every imaginable way to encode a text, and eventually, after the computer had cracked it, the investigators realized that not only had Zodiac used a highly sophisticated way of scrambling letters; he had made mistakes! So it was only possible to crack a very difficult cipher with mistakes through brute force computer. How is it that that the Voynich Manuscript has survived even longer, and more importantly, why the need to create this level of difficult cipher?
If all you are doing is hiding information about botany, why do you need to go to such lengths as the scribes did? Iirc both Alan Turing and the guy who cracked the Japanese code in WW2 worked on the manuscript (and failed), so, if you're a 14th century botanist who wants to hid information about your plants, why do you need a cipher that is more difficult to crack than the Germans and Japanese used in a world war?
There is a really good video about the Z-340 cipher here on YouTube (link below). Looking at that, the sheer power of computer brute force solving, I am feeling less and less that there is any meaning to the text. And I ask: "why the need to create such a complex cipher?"
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
|
|
|
|
| How could it be proven it's a medieval hoax? |
|
Posted by: djurpet - 17-11-2024, 03:17 PM - Forum: Voynich Talk
- Replies (2)
|
|
Apologies if this has already been covered. I'm just wondering if such a thing would even be possible to prove. For example, lets assume that a few scribes from the 15th century knew that a local ruler is willing to pay a lot of money for obscure/occult books and they decided to make one in a script that visually has some resemblance to a real language but has no meaning.
We know that certain symbols are almost exclusively used as suffixes or prefixes so they must have had some algorithm/method for generating the text. If someone finds a convincing method for generating voynichese words (maybe that's already been done, idk) would that be enough evidence to conclude it's a medieval hoax? Or what other evidence would be needed?
The problems with this theory are that there was probably no need for the makers of VM to bother with a method for generating words for a meaningless text that they wanted to sell to someone - they could have just arranged the letters totally randomly. Also, there are some words that are concentrated in parts of the book that cover similar topics which could suggest that the text actually has meaning - or it could suggest that the scribe who worked on the herbal parts maybe had one method for generating words and the scribe who worked on the cosmological part had a slightly different method.
|
|
|
|
| It must be a language - because how much about linguistics did they know so long ago? |
|
Posted by: addekallstrom - 15-11-2024, 11:30 PM - Forum: Analysis of the text
- Replies (2)
|
|
One of the most interesting things about this manuscript is that it follows certain hard rules about texts and corpus. Specifically with reference to things like hapax legomena, which I find fascinating in and of itself (I used hapax legomena for a small section of my master's thesis).
It has always made me wonder: how much of the rules of natural language was known in 14th century HRE/Central Europe?
Like, suppose it is all a big hoax, would the hoaxer have been aware that all corpus have a set amount of hapax legomena? Would he have planned for it in commissioning the book? Would he have expected his buyer to look for hapax legomena, and that the potential buyer might have looked at the text and gone: "Hmrph, not enough hapax legomena, clearly not a language."
If that wasn't known, then there's no way that it would happen accidentally, right?
How much do we know about what they knew about conlangs in the 14th century?
|
|
|
|
| It cannot be a language - in reference to Koen's latest video |
|
Posted by: addekallstrom - 15-11-2024, 11:23 PM - Forum: Analysis of the text
- Replies (14)
|
|
Koen did a fantastic video about a month ago where he showed that Voynich really only has 8 functional letters. I've racked my brains trying to come up with any language even close to that and the closest I can think of is if Japanese dropped the diacritics and the syllabary structure of the written language. They would still end up with 14 characters!
Vowels:
a
i
u
e
o
Consonants:
k
s
t
n
h
m
y
r
w
This is setting aside the fact that there are still five more consonants in the Japanese language, g z d b p, which are currently marked by diactritics. I'm not sure if a Japanese speaker would be able to comfortable read a text without diacritics. You could also, perhaps, merge n and m into one one sound as the ん (n) can make both [n] and [m] sounds depending on what sounds follow it.
So, bending and breaking every concievable rule, Japanese can, at best, get down to 13 characters, and in doing so making the reading process quite arduous. And thats 60% more characters than the Voynich manuscript has!
It just can't be a language. It cannot...
|
|
|
|
| Was the color original? A (very crude) analysis of color in Herbal A and Herbal B |
|
Posted by: addekallstrom - 08-11-2024, 11:02 AM - Forum: Physical material
- Replies (6)
|
|
Hi!
This is my first post, I am not a color expert, I am not a statistician, but I do have some interesting data that someone more qualified could expand upon.
In some of the recent YouTube videos by Koen, it was argued (I thought very persuasively) that the scribes also painted the paintings. This made me wonder: can we see a difference in what colors are used on the flowers? Can this be used to determine if the color is original or if it was added later?
My contention is the following:
(a) if the color was added later, there would be no difference in coloring between Herbal A and Herbal B, since a later painter would not know the difference.
thus,
(b) if there is any noticable difference in how color is used between Herbal A and Herbal B, it must mean that the color is original.
I conducted a very simple test. I separated all paintings of flowers into Herbal A or Herbal B on voynichese.com
I then asked a simple question: "what colors are found on the page?" and did a simple "yes/no" for each color I found.
I grouped it the following way:
It is very simple, and not very precise, but having gone through every image of flowers in Herbal A and Herbal B, I did find some striking results:
Herbal A colors:
Herbal B colors:
As you can see, there is a stark difference between the usage of the color red.
The only pages where Herbal B uses red are: f40v, f46v, f55r, and f95r1.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. might actually be brown and not even red. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. only uses a miniscule amount of red, if not a very reddish brown. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. uses a reddish brown again.
f95r1 is the only Herbal B where I feel that red is definitely used, and it is only small dots.
Compare that to the use of red (or very reddish brown) which is used extensively, on basically half of all pages, in Herbal A.
This indicates at the very least that the scribe of Herbal B didn't like red. Or perhaps that Herbal B wasn't completely finished, since there is white on almost every single Herbal B page, and maybe red was only used as a finishing color(?).
In any way, speculation aside, there is a clear, stark difference in the usage of the color red between Herbal A and Herbal B. This could not have been the case if the color was added later by someone who didn't know the difference between Herbal A and Herbal B.
My humble conclusion, therefore, is that the color was added by the scribes. I am sure that someone better equipped to do these kinds of experiments could find even more robust research. I am not very good at these things.
Thank you for reading.
|
|
|
|
|
