-JKP- > 18-11-2016, 02:33 AM
(18-11-2016, 01:59 AM)stellar Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Dear Witch Mountain,
Many Bibles have different translations as you know.
Here is one which uses beasts.
stellar > 18-11-2016, 02:46 AM
(18-11-2016, 02:33 AM)-JKP- Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(18-11-2016, 01:59 AM)stellar Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Dear Witch Mountain,
Many Bibles have different translations as you know.
Here is one which uses beasts.
Why would Dee encrypt Bible passages that were known by rote by everyone in the Christianized world?
-JKP- > 18-11-2016, 02:49 AM
(18-11-2016, 02:46 AM)stellar Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(18-11-2016, 02:33 AM)-JKP- Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(18-11-2016, 01:59 AM)stellar Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Dear Witch Mountain,
Many Bibles have different translations as you know.
Here is one which uses beasts.
Why would Dee encrypt Bible passages that were known by rote by everyone in the Christianized world?
My best guess would be filler. Or he felt it was important to add in. Maybe he was intrigued by the story of the Garden of Eden. The VMS does have many plants.
stellar > 18-11-2016, 03:06 AM
-JKP- > 18-11-2016, 05:03 AM
(18-11-2016, 03:06 AM)stellar Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.JKP,
Seeing how we all know the VMS is a tough crack which is beside the point. The question you pose I believe is silly. If Dee was interested in the Garden of Eden and the story of the Fall of man, I see no reason why not, or he could encrypt anything he felt like. With all the plants in the VMS maybe it adds artistic flair. After all Dee saw his woman with Kelly and maybe he was affected by that.
Why did I encrypt your paragraph, it contained information that's why. JKP, anytime you encrypt anything its time consuming and another point which I find silly from you.
I also believe since their are two crosses in the VMS that it does have a spiritual Christian side to it.
Koen G > 18-11-2016, 06:29 AM
stellar > 18-11-2016, 06:32 AM
(18-11-2016, 05:03 AM)-JKP- Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Two crosses? One of those crosses is on a crown. That's how crowns were designed. If you want to represent a specific person, like the emperor or empress, you have to draw the crown a certain way. It may not have anything whatsoever to do with Christianity as far as the person who drew it was concerned.
Stellar, I don't think I'm going to bother with your posts any more.
Here is why:
Assumption #1: You say Dee did it, even though he was born a century after the probable creation of the manuscript and his hand does not match well to the VMS hand.
Assumption #2: It is numerology (you still haven't shown any proof, only loose "translations" that could be done in any language).
Assumption #3: Even if it is numerology, you have arbitrarily assigned values to the VMS characters. No proof that they are the correct assignations.
Assumption #4: It is Welsh. No proof of this either. In fact, Thomas got more "hits" when using a different language.
Assumption #5: The text matches the images. No one has any proof of this. Your interpretations of the text are based on your assumptions about the images which, in themselves, are open to question. There's no proof or even strong evidence that the big plant with the serpentine creature in the root is the story of Eden. It might be a worm rather than a snake.
Assumption #5: The manuscript has a Christian side. Very flimsy evidence. Crosses were used in non-Christian imagery as well, and also by non-Christians living in Christian societies where the cross was a prevalent icon. The pool creature doesn't look like a whale and the nymph doesn't look like Jonah. It might be a biblical story but there are good arguments from other researchers that it might something else which I suggested you read, but apparently you didn't.
And there are more, but there are already too many assumptions to take any of this seriously, since all you do is defend your assumptions by adding more, rather than re-evaluating them.
stellar > 18-11-2016, 08:27 AM
-JKP- > 18-11-2016, 08:48 AM
-JKP- > 18-11-2016, 08:51 AM