Linda > 18-07-2016, 06:49 AM
(17-07-2016, 10:22 PM)Searcher Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I've just found You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., it shows almost all picture, but I'm waiting for Job's reply, after all.
Only remind that in my interpretation:
qokeedy, qokedy, qokchdy - procatum, perlocutum, perlucidum (invocation, expressed, clear or pellucid), so, even, if qokeedy or qokedy are doubled, it can be the word combination procatum perlocutum (an expressed invocation); tripled - ? (for now, but, maybe, verse);
ol - os (mouth, speech, bone);
qotedy, qoteedy, qotchdy - probatum (tested, good, verified)
Searcher > 18-07-2016, 06:01 PM
(18-07-2016, 06:49 AM)Linda Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(17-07-2016, 10:22 PM)Searcher Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I've just found You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., it shows almost all picture, but I'm waiting for Job's reply, after all.
Only remind that in my interpretation:
qokeedy, qokedy, qokchdy - procatum, perlocutum, perlucidum (invocation, expressed, clear or pellucid), so, even, if qokeedy or qokedy are doubled, it can be the word combination procatum perlocutum (an expressed invocation); tripled - ? (for now, but, maybe, verse);
ol - os (mouth, speech, bone);
qotedy, qoteedy, qotchdy - probatum (tested, good, verified)
Just something I noticed, not sure what it means. I wrote down the pages where your vord choices occurred, then looked up which page made up the bifolio and in almost all cases they were matches of each other, ie one piece of vellum. in only three cases the other side of the bifolio does not also contain the vords, i wrote the matching pages in parentheses in those cases, but in those cases, the only vords on the page that does show one is qokedy for all three of these.
f26/f31 quire 4
33/40 quire 5
34/39 quire 5
41/48 quire 6
43/46 quire 6
50(55) quire 7
57/66 quire 8 (66 has a page of writing where it occurs)
73 quire 12, other side missing
all quire 13
quire 14 (one page without, don't know about rosettes side)
89(88) quire 15
95(94) quire 17
all quire 20
stellar > 08-10-2016, 05:51 AM
(27-04-2016, 10:39 PM)Searcher Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I welcome everyone to read my study and deciphered text of a few VMs pages. I know it is nonstandart and doesn't correspond to usual deciphering methods and rules, but I hope you won't waste your time. Please, if you read it, read to the end. Some questions of my approach is clarified closer to the second part or to the end of this work.
David shared links to my PDF file, but, as I corrected some mistakes, I've updated it and putted it here.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Searcher > 08-10-2016, 08:40 PM
(08-10-2016, 05:51 AM)stellar Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Searcher please decode the Zodiac labels of folio 67r2. I believe that will verify your findings. Why because it has to be in order counter clockwise and this will restrict you to following rules we can all agree upon. If you can do this in Latin than you will make a great deal of sense to us all and perhaps win me over.
stellar > 09-10-2016, 05:13 AM
(08-10-2016, 08:40 PM)Searcher Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(08-10-2016, 05:51 AM)stellar Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Searcher please decode the Zodiac labels of folio 67r2. I believe that will verify your findings. Why because it has to be in order counter clockwise and this will restrict you to following rules we can all agree upon. If you can do this in Latin than you will make a great deal of sense to us all and perhaps win me over.
Hi, Tom!
I'll try, but I don't promise a successful result as this part is quite problematic for meI will write about the attemption later.
Searcher > 05-01-2017, 11:48 PM
Quote:Searcher have you found a way using Latin to find the Zodiac words yet from You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.?
stellar > 05-01-2017, 11:57 PM
Searcher > 06-01-2017, 09:49 PM
(05-01-2017, 11:57 PM)stellar Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Searcher,
I'm no Latin expert by a long shot and sorry this format, I'm highly confused of your interpretation. Also, why have you have labeled the Zodiac in a clockwise fashion? Hopefully not the Zodiac representations as-well! Did you find Aries and the other 12 signs? I will be amazed if Thomas Coon and JKP concurs that you have found Latin Zodiac Labels for the 12 signs.
Sorry if I did not comprehend this if I misinterpreted what you have written.
Searcher > 07-01-2017, 11:48 PM
Searcher > 12-11-2017, 12:19 AM