• Options
• Login
• Desktop Style

IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT (well, sort of)

• Index

  • The Voynich Ninja
  • Voynich Research
  • Theories & Solutions
  • IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT (well, sort of)
• IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT (well, sort of)

• RE: IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT (well, sort of)

  Koen G > 3 hours ago

  (11 hours ago)asteckley Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Unfortunately, Jorge, people do seem to be missing the point of the SDA.   Looking forward to your reveal, though.

  
  We are just having some fun with anagrams, since this thread is intriguing but there's not much to go on yet. Patrick and I added our own anagrams of predictions about Stolfi's reveal.
  
  Stolfi, you did put the bar high for yourself by saying it's "not a theory, interpretation, guess, etc, but a fact." So is the anagram necessary because you think someone else might make the same discovery while you are working on it?

• RE: IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT (well, sort of)

  Jorge_Stolfi > 2 hours ago

  (Today, 12:06 AM)oshfdk Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.There is not a single R in this anagram, which is a positive sign, at least for me.

  
  So you think it cannot be "sakanobotta"? 
  
  All the best, --stolfi

• RE: IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT (well, sort of)

  oshfdk > 1 hour ago

  (2 hours ago)Jorge_Stolfi Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.So you think it cannot be "sakanobotta"? 

  
  I hope it's not. Really, for me to return the massive sakanobotta theories to good standing I think nothing would work short of a written affidavit of the sakanobotters accompanied by a detailed explanation of the sakanobotting techniques used, preferably with some video evidence.

• RE: IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT (well, sort of)

  oshfdk > 32 minutes ago

  (11 hours ago)asteckley Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Unfortunately, Jorge, people do seem to be missing the point of the SDA.

  
  I don't think there is a point in the modern world, other than entertainment. If the point was to protect the priority of some discovery, a modern hash would work better. An anagram of this length most likely has several possible readings in some languages, discoverable via brute force, which makes it possible for people to dispute the original reading, especially if it's not very specific. On the other hand, if it's specific it should be in principle possible to enumerate all anagrams of these letters (a few hundred millions, I think), run a dictionary attack, get something like a 10**5 plausible results and run them through an LLM to identify those that would make sense in the context of a discovery related to the Voynich MS, effectively breaking the secret. 
  
  So, the point is having fun and we are having fun.

• RE: IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT (well, sort of)

  DG97EEB > 32 minutes ago

  I think we should challenge both the standard theory and the modern forgery theory and introduce a new "future past theory", where it was in fact created by Satoshi Nakamoto with a time machine financed via his huge store of bitcoin...
• Next Oldest Next Newest