[attachment=1664][attachment=1664]Here I am after holidays…
A remark about material produced by Mr. Zandbergen that drove me to try again deciphering, unluckily without any certain result, problems are always the same: without a better definition the result is not certain and disputable.
Also for the ancient reader the problem was always to determine the beginning and the end of a letter/microscopic symbol inside a voynich letter container even if he had stencils at his command to superimpose on microscopic symbols and determine them.
Being stencil lost (or hidden in the cover) we have to find first all 96 letters/microscopic symbols and then with a CAD program superimpose them on microscopic symbols to determine the letter.
After my last video “Back to real dimensions” You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view. I took care at the “hardware” of the Book, that is the real possibility to use this writing system.
First of all Voynich was written with a pen-nib, not whit a quill: the beginning of lot of microscopic symbols shows signs of two metallic point of the pen-nib that scratching parchment surface penetrate ink deeper.
I measured my pen-nib with a caliper, it is mm.0,2 width, corresponding to the smallest microscopic symbol I found, named “02” and which measure mm. 0,2x0,3, as shown in You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view. (1006097).
Providing that someone want to claim that the ancient writer, while he was writing the stem of letter container “9” would have sneezed and the stroke didn’t be uniform.
To close the problem is always the same: not Voynich impenetrability but arrogance of its curators (Mr. Clemens, Mr. Schroeder etc.), a kind of sad Voynich’s men in black who prevent deciphering.
Hereafter I show differences between JPEG files and TIFF 400 DPI files available and microscopic image observation produced by Mr. Zandbergen. It’s clear that in JPEG images and TIFF 400 DPI images some particulars look distorted or neither you can see them.
Microscope definition is excessive, but with 1200 DPI enlargements we can easily decipher Voynich.
Dear sir, this is the solution, whether you like it or not, but since Beinecke smarties don’t share enlargements we can do nothing, we will continue to talk about solutions based on replacement method, a letter with many meanings or shortenings…
I remember my videos containing the solution:
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
Unluckily the real problem is that for enlargements I can wait tha Mr. Clemens and Mr. Schroeder go home in retirement and take their place an enlightened man.
But if Voynich would be lost or destroyed don’t will be possible to know its content because its reproduction don’t have enough resolution and are unreadable.
Giuseppe Bianchi