Why and how the text could be Bavarian
(24-09-2026, 04:30 PM)Stefan Wirtz_2 wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Others count 13.85 for q, ~16.5 for ch, ~8% for sh. Quite a lot of representation, so that's the stats. You may have a correlation, but not really a conclusion by it.

Again, that "anomaly" was not "the frequency of Sh-tokens is similar to that of qo-tokens".  It was "the frequency of qo-tokens after Sh-tokens is greater that of qo-tokens in general".  

This claim does not depend on the freqency of Sh-tokens.

All the best, --stolfi

PS. The ~15% for qo-tokens that I quoted was for my transcription, deleting all commas and counting "-" as ".', and considering only tokens whose first two EVA characters are letters [a-z] (not weirdos or '?').  If I had treated commas as spaces and considered all tokens, the percentage would indeed be lower than 15%.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Why and how the text could be Bavarian - by Jorge_Stolfi - 24-09-2026, 07:13 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)