No text, but a visual code

[Linda]

 
   I have shown you two cosmological pages that share elements with the Rosettes, which is a clear indication that they are related. You ask me to lay out the arguments for what I’m thinking at any given moment, and when I show you proof, you dismiss it with some excuse. In reality, you don't want to learn.

   Linda, I accept your apologies, but please read what I write. Over time, I have given many reasons why the Rosettes are a cosmological representation. In my last post, I provided further evidence, but you prefer to keep thinking that it is a magical fairy land. You don't want to learn either.

   If there is one thing that particularly bothers me, it is you saying that I have never claimed the Voynich is a medical book—until now. Please read the attached document from May 2018, when I first started contributing to the forum.

Thank you and I will keep reading what you write. I don't think it is a magical fairy land, actually, i was just taking the child theme to the limit, just to show that there are things we still may not have even thought of, per se, which might be more correct in terms of what the authors had in mind, we just don't have a way yet to be certain. 

When you said it was a medical book, I actually asked AI to go though your thread looking for previous references thereof because i truly hadn't incorporated that into my understanding of your theory. But, it did not find any, other than the mention of medicinal plants. I may have missed things over the years, I haven't been here the whole time since i joined and may not have read everything in your thread, and it is rather daunting to think about starting it over again, as someone else recently mentioned. I am gearing up to revisit my own theory, since much of my old postings were image heavy with many dead links. I saw someone else asking you if there is a place to see your whole theory at once, maybe you could do a recap of sorts as well so all the new people can be aware of all the elements thereof, and anyone else who might have missed something along the way can be caught up too. But I don't see an attachment, sorry. I do think I understand the cosmological representation, though.

May I also ask which two cosmological pages you mentioned to ololololo? I went back 20 pages so far but did not see it yet, was it links or images? Thanks! If the attachment from May 2018 is a word document that explains the symbols, I am not able to open it at present with the device I am using.