No text, but a visual code

[ololololo]

ololololo's treasure map

Antonio, I’m sorry to disappoint you, but that doesn’t offend me  I don’t think you can criticize this theory on its merits — you can only resort to this kind of mockery.

When I spoke about the prejudices against accepting my theory on the Rosettes, I was thinking precisely of you: ololololo and Linda

I don’t think the Rosettes are a map. I think the Rosettes could be a map. But then their purpose and style would be unclear (after all, you could just draw a city). 
Once again, you failed to portray me as biased  I adhere to a fundamentally different principle regarding VMS — we cannot prove or know anything for certain, we can only assume.

In other words, you are not objective

First, you are either unable or simply unwilling to criticize the messages of other participants. You act as if we are all supposed to believe you by default (or at least not to be indignant). For example, you haven’t put forward a single serious argument against the idea of anatomy; you’ve simply reduced it to the claim that “my greatest theory is more obvious and more brilliant.”
Secondly, are you being objective? You can’t prove or explain your interpretations to me (yes, there is a certain doctrine about the connection between the stars and herbs, but you won’t find, say, a nymph descending to a plant. In other words, I don’t see any serious evidence myself yet, and you, apparently out of arrogance, don’t want to show it to me). Moreover, you perceive your theory as an unconditional truth, resolutely rejecting everything else. This is subjectivity itself.

By the way, all my questions remained unanswered...