13-08-2026, 08:09 PM
(13-08-2026, 04:43 PM)Antonio García Jiménez wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.You say that the "water slide" You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. is similar to illutrations of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. of De Balneis, but I don't see any resemblance whatsoever.Antonio, we’re talking about the overall appearance. At the very least, it really does look like a drawing of a lake, and in this elongated style, it sometimes appears in manuscripts.
Similarity does not mean being exactly the same.
(13-08-2026, 04:43 PM)Antonio García Jiménez wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I have stated that this is not my theory, but that it reveals there are ways of viewing Quire 13 other than the conventional ones—which have led nowhere.Well, the claim is strange.
If interpretations lead nowhere, should we abandon the analysis? Or perhaps take your word for it?
This is not appropriate criticism. Criticism should not be based on “one’s own experience” or “one’s own knowledge,” but should focus on the essence — the contradictions in the theory, inconsistencies, and errors.
In any case, I don’t see any reason to reject this theory outright. In my opinion, it is indeed likely, even though the part about plant souls sounds strange.

