No text, but a visual code

[ololololo]

ololololo (Michael), you joined the forum only two months ago, full of enthusiasm and talking about everything as if you already had it all figured out.

Oh, maybe that's true. If anything, i'm sorry.
But, first of all, I do not claim that I "understood" (this can be attributed to you). I just have a lot of assumptions about many aspects of VMS. I do not know if they are true, and even more so I can't prove it.
Secondly, my goal is not to impose my point of view, because your approach is nevertheless very interesting and quite valuable in itself, even if it turns out to be erroneous. 
I'm trying to figure out why I should count the same way you do. How should I come to the same conclusion as you? For example, I don't see anything on the Rosettes that would connect them to space. I see two Suns, urban architecture, and some spheres. Beyond your contextual bias that "everything written in VMS is about space," will I also be able to see something cosmic in Rosettes?

---

If I weren't feeling tired and heading to bed soon, I’d write a 2,000-word post about the Rosettes foldout.

Good night!