No text, but a visual code

[ololololo]

I'm not fooling myself, ololololo (I'd like to know your name).

Michael
Nice to meet you, Antonio

I do know what the images say—what the graphic language of the Voynich conveys. It is not a matter of you believing me, but rather of following my reasoning and the coherent system I am attempting to build, which applies to the entire codex, not just parts of it.

For example, I don’t agree that the fact that nymphs emerge from these pipes and that this is what connects them is obvious.
On its own, it’s logical, but it’s quite difficult to confirm it using VMS. For example, as you say, f75r — roughly speaking, “nymphs descending from space” (I apologize if I expressed your idea inaccurately, but you understand me). So what is the appendage nearby, then?

There is only one possible interpretation: the one intended by its authors.

That's true. 
However, the only way to find out exactly what they depicted is to translate the text or invent a time machine.
Even if you’ve figured out what they drew in their book, you currently won’t be able to confirm that this is indeed what it is. Why aren’t the Rosettes the female reproductive system, as some scientific journal suggested? Their argument is that there are seven tubes near the central Island — they say that in the Middle Ages it was believed that the uterus had the same number of vessels (or something along those lines).

Trying to decipher the script is a dead end. I don't think there is anything to read.

I won’t judge you for this approach, as it’s part of your theory. I also won’t criticize you for not being able to describe it. When working with a text, I myself sometimes can’t describe it in its entirety
However, on the other hand, this thesis works in your favor, as it essentially relieves you of the need to seek confirmation for your interpretations of the illustrations. 
Although you may not understand this, of course, there’s no room for self‑confidence then.
For example, this:

This is a metaphorical representation of the stars making a journey to transmit their influence to Earth—specifically, to the herbs in the herbal.

Find confirmation of this.
The fact that everything was supposedly depicted with great symbolism in the Middle Ages is not an argument.

The flaw in your theory is that you take it as an unquestionable truth. I can find similarities between all the features you’ve listed and other things that are simpler than such an intricate astrological interpretation (which, moreover, is meaningless — why produce an unreadable book? What in it is truly astrological/astronomical? The phenomena you describe are more akin to some kind of mythology or unconventional astrology, but not to classical medieval astrology).