09-08-2026, 04:33 PM
I'm not fooling myself, ololololo (I'd like to know your name).
I do know what the images say—what the graphic language of the Voynich conveys. It is not a matter of you believing me, but rather of following my reasoning and the coherent system I am attempting to build, which applies to the entire codex, not just parts of it.
The images in the Voynich manuscript are not a matter of subjective interpretation, as you claim. It is not a work of abstract art where everyone sees what they want to see. There is only one possible interpretation: the one intended by its authors.
Trying to decipher the script is a dead end. I don't think there is anything to read. They are just groups of astronomical symbols that must have some astrological significance. Since I know this is hard to believe, I focus on the images in the codex to show that it is an astrological book.
I do know what the images say—what the graphic language of the Voynich conveys. It is not a matter of you believing me, but rather of following my reasoning and the coherent system I am attempting to build, which applies to the entire codex, not just parts of it.
The images in the Voynich manuscript are not a matter of subjective interpretation, as you claim. It is not a work of abstract art where everyone sees what they want to see. There is only one possible interpretation: the one intended by its authors.
Trying to decipher the script is a dead end. I don't think there is anything to read. They are just groups of astronomical symbols that must have some astrological significance. Since I know this is hard to believe, I focus on the images in the codex to show that it is an astrological book.