(14-07-2026, 09:54 AM)tavie wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Proponents of the hoax theory have claimed all of these? Even the "7 rules" one?
A number of your posts are still reading like they have been written by an LLM. If that is the case, please don't use it like that. Strict translation only.
And I'm still not sure how you have refuted these claims without producing text.
Hi Tavie
??? No, I swear this wasn't written using AI—it was just translated with DeepL, and there wasn't even any AI involved.
No, this is just a condensed version of what I did in my previous post. And as an author, I certainly know this better than any AI
Most of these points are described here in this post along with their sources, so I didn't want to repeat them again. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
The rest can be found in the PDF
And yet, regarding the theory with the 7 rules, I read somewhere that it’s an indication that this doesn’t represent a language.And that makes sense, of course—normally, you can't use just seven rules to determine where about 92 % spaces go in any language. (Except, actually, in Chinese but there are only 5 )