Why and how the text could be Bavarian

[oshfdk]

OMG. That’s nothing more than rhetorical sophistry! I’m not that stupid, sorry.

I don't understand what it is you are arguing for or against. And I'm really not sure if I'm contributing anything in this thread at all. But just as a wrap up, do you realize what would happen if someone actually reads deeply into your arguments and actually decides it's a good idea to follow them and would actually present a verifiable reproducible way of converting Bavarian into plausible Voynichese, that after some time leads to a decipherment? Most likely this breakthrough will be attributed to that person and your research will get a footnote at best. As it turns out there is even a name for it, it's called the Stigler's law: in science in many (most?) cases it's not the person who came up with some idea, it's the person who presented it in a verifiable and provable way who takes the full credit. It's Hubble telescope and Hubble constant, not the guy's who actually came up with the expanding universe mathematical model, I don't even remember his name. It's Darwin's theory, even though I think all elements of it had been independently described before, but Darwin was the first one to actually present overwhelming amount of hard evidence. Given all this I don't even understand why you appear to truly believe in your method and yet refuse to make the single most important step that will actually make it your method.