OMG. That’s nothing more than rhetorical sophistry! I’m not that stupid, sorry.
But sure, I’m happy to argue on that level too.
I’ll rephrase it to make it very clear!
Let’s not view the VBM as a solution, because it isn’t one yet (!). I never claimed it was.
Let’s view it as proof that the VBM has refuted a large portion of the arguments made by proponents of the Hoax theory.
Proponents of the hoax theory have claimed:
The VMS can’t be a language because these multiple word repetitions make no sense in a normal language. (qokedy chain)
Refuted
The VMS can’t be a language because it exhibits this long-range effect of glyphs across multiple characters and a space.
Refuted
VMS cannot be a language because only 7 rules can predict word boundaries.
Refuted
VMS cannot be a language due to its word-length structure.
Refuted
The repetitions of words and similar phrases cannot constitute a language.
Refuted
Repetitions of words with only a single letter shift cannot constitute a language.
Refuted
The low letter entropy contradicts the idea that it is a language.
Refuted
The frequency of hapaxes and the condensed head structure contradict the idea that it is a language.
Refuted
Those are most of the arguments put forward by hoax proponents, and VBM can refute all of them, with only a few rules —provably. Can you point out just one of them that isn’t true?- Instead of discussing generalities here?
So for now, let’s just stick with the fact that VBM is very strong evidence that VMS is indeed a coded language.
And if that’s the case, the question arises: why should it be a hoax? According to Ockham’s Razor, that’s actually rather unlikely.
That’s enough for a start on this theory.
But sure, I’m happy to argue on that level too.
I’ll rephrase it to make it very clear! Let’s not view the VBM as a solution, because it isn’t one yet (!). I never claimed it was.
Let’s view it as proof that the VBM has refuted a large portion of the arguments made by proponents of the Hoax theory.
Proponents of the hoax theory have claimed:
The VMS can’t be a language because these multiple word repetitions make no sense in a normal language. (qokedy chain)
Refuted
The VMS can’t be a language because it exhibits this long-range effect of glyphs across multiple characters and a space.
Refuted
VMS cannot be a language because only 7 rules can predict word boundaries.
Refuted
VMS cannot be a language due to its word-length structure.
Refuted
The repetitions of words and similar phrases cannot constitute a language.
Refuted
Repetitions of words with only a single letter shift cannot constitute a language.
Refuted
The low letter entropy contradicts the idea that it is a language.
Refuted
The frequency of hapaxes and the condensed head structure contradict the idea that it is a language.
Refuted
Those are most of the arguments put forward by hoax proponents, and VBM can refute all of them, with only a few rules —provably. Can you point out just one of them that isn’t true?- Instead of discussing generalities here?
So for now, let’s just stick with the fact that VBM is very strong evidence that VMS is indeed a coded language.
And if that’s the case, the question arises: why should it be a hoax? According to Ockham’s Razor, that’s actually rather unlikely.
That’s enough for a start on this theory.