Why and how the text could be Bavarian

[ololololo]

I can't help but point again the similarity to how in the Chinese thread the Chinese origin is presented as an established/proven fact.

This is normal, in principle. This arises from the fact that people consider their theory to be, first of all, obvious, and therefore the most correct...

But even now, in its unfinished version, the VBM already shows a clear superiority over many other theories

The criterion of truth for you is, apparently, logical impeccability. If the approach does not require assumptions and is "simple" (and it may be simple for you, but I did not understand it immediately, to be honest), then it automatically becomes correct? No...
There are many such consistent theories. For example, someone named Thorsten believed thatYou are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.. You called this theory eisegesis, but the author said that this model had produced "consistent" results many times. How can you tell who's right?
In terms of VMS, you shouldn't be sure about anything, and it's important to be willing to accept that your theory might be wrong. I take this position because it's not biased.
Also it's even more important not to give up