13-07-2026, 04:20 PM
To be honest, I don't know what to write in response anymore, which is why it took me so long to reply.
I approach the text exactly the way I do. I think that’s exactly the right approach to deciphering it. I look for statistical peculiarities and ask myself which model explains them most plausibly.
Once I’ve reached the point where I have a deeper understanding of the cipher—and that’s a lengthy process with many setbacks—I’ll build a generator. That could take days, weeks, months—who knows....
But even now, in its unfinished version, the VBM already shows a clear superiority over many other theories (actually, I don’t know of any that can achieve all this with so few resources)—which simply suggests that this might be the right path and probably will be.
I approach the text exactly the way I do. I think that’s exactly the right approach to deciphering it. I look for statistical peculiarities and ask myself which model explains them most plausibly.
Once I’ve reached the point where I have a deeper understanding of the cipher—and that’s a lengthy process with many setbacks—I’ll build a generator. That could take days, weeks, months—who knows....
But even now, in its unfinished version, the VBM already shows a clear superiority over many other theories (actually, I don’t know of any that can achieve all this with so few resources)—which simply suggests that this might be the right path and probably will be.