19-06-2026, 09:59 AM
(23-05-2018, 07:05 PM)Antonio García Jiménez wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Hello everyone,Well, your theory sounds quite interesting. But such theories are complicated, particularly in terms of proof. I remember a theory that the writing of a manuscript is a way of drawing different patterns in an 8x8 square and the arguments were based only on the first page. Of course, I'm not comparing your theory, but to prove it, you need to create a very precise and consistent system. Just because you can do it doesn't mean a medieval scholar can.
I think there is not a language in the Voynich. No letters, no alphabet, nothing phonetic. It is only a visual code, an astronomical-astrological code which indicate the location of the stars in the celestial sphere. Each star of the Zodiac provide its virtue to an herb, therefore was very important identify well the stars
One of the nuances of the theory is that it assumes that the manuscript in its current form (or at least most of it) was intended to be read this way: that everything was meant to be, that every detail carries a huge inner meaning, that everything means something... This is a very vulnerable position. If it turns out that the plants were painted blue simply because the artist had an excess of blue paint, then half of the theory will be destroyed.

