06-06-2026, 09:31 PM
(06-06-2026, 08:45 PM)JoJo_Jost wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Yes, I'm aware of it, I've studied your new theory, and I want to say that I once thought about it in a similar way (however, I felt that the text behaves somewhat simpler). Your approach is more accurate than many, but at the moment it's just an approach (as is mine(06-06-2026, 08:18 PM)ololololo wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.In general, after looking at, your approach is actually unusual and stands out from all the "German" hypotheses. I don't even have any objections... However, as I have identified, Voynichese is simpler and represents a numerical substitution (I have written a post about it). Perhaps we should try working with the Bavarian language and compare the statistics.
I also think that we should focus more on how the manuscript is written rather than what language it is written in.
Unfortunately, what you quoted there is already outdated... I’ve completely changed the cipher model. Unfortunately, I can’t delete the old one. But according to the forum rules, if I continue to assume it’s MHD / Bavarian, I have to stay in my thread, which is why I’ve continued posting here even though I’ve changed my approach.
I’ve read your Thread about numerical substitution and I’m not convinced yet.Sorry...
(The new theory starts with this post: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.)
)...However, you should find more correlations with the manuscript text and improve your model to get more accurate results. Even if there are similarities in the statistics between the MHD and VMS you have encrypted, you should not stop there.


Sorry...![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)