The real structure of VMS?
I've made a lot of progress. I can now rewrite the structure of large parts of the VMS into the VCCV (V1 C1 C2 V) structure without making to many assumptions. It actually results in an interesting flow.
The fascinating thing is that a logical flow emerges almost on its own, one that Flow fits perfectly with European and other languages. Simply because of its clear vowel and consonant structure.
Nevertheless, I’m sticking with MHD for now, for several reasons: One important one is that since C1 must be very short (you can tell this because clear, familiar, and repetitive glyph sequences often appear after C1), it fits perfectly with MHD. This is because in MHD, the ends of words are often single consonants. Here, too, the frequencies—when comparing the number of words ending with one consonant to those ending with two—align with the observations in the VMS.
Here is an example of what the VMS likely actually looks like:
(Note: It's not perfect yet, but it's pretty close.)
<...> = Vocablock It is formed by the glyphs that appear in a previously space
(...) = C1 The last consonant of a word or syllable in the VMS is placed in the middle of the normal tokens
[...] = C2 The First consonant of a word or syllable in the VMS is placed in the middle of the normal tokens in
|...| = LSM / line start marker (Line start & End markes unsolved)
f3r.1 ORIGINAL:
tsheos qopal chol cthol daimg
f3r.1 SEGMENTED:
|t| <∅sh> (e) [o]<sqo>(p) [a]<lch>(o)<lcth>(o)<ld>(a) [im] <g∅>
f3r.2 ORIGINAL:
ycheor chor dam qotcham cham
f3r.2 SEGMENTED:
|y| <∅ch> (e) [o]<rch>(o)<rd>(a)<mqo>(t) [ch]<amch>(a)<m∅>
f3r.3 ORIGINAL:
ochor qocheor chol daiin cthy
f3r.3 SEGMENTED:
|o| <∅ch>(o)<rqo>(ch) [eo]<rch>(o)<ld>aiin<cth> (y∅)
f3r.4 ORIGINAL:
schey chor chal chag cham cho
f3r.4 SEGMENTIERT:
|s| (∅che)<ych>(o)<rch>(a)<lch>(a)<gch> (a)<mch>(o∅)
f3r.5 ORIGINAL:
qokol chololy s cham cthol
f3r.5 SEGMENTIERT:
|qo| <∅k>(o)<lch> (o)[lo]<lys> <ch>(a)<mcth>(o)<l∅>
This naturally gives rise to new word boundaries, which, however, are still “assumed” here.
It's also fascinating that part of the code seems to be that the vowels in “Eva” are actually consonants, and vice versa.
I've made a lot of progress. I can now rewrite the structure of large parts of the VMS into the VCCV (V1 C1 C2 V) structure without making to many assumptions. It actually results in an interesting flow.
The fascinating thing is that a logical flow emerges almost on its own, one that Flow fits perfectly with European and other languages. Simply because of its clear vowel and consonant structure.
Nevertheless, I’m sticking with MHD for now, for several reasons: One important one is that since C1 must be very short (you can tell this because clear, familiar, and repetitive glyph sequences often appear after C1), it fits perfectly with MHD. This is because in MHD, the ends of words are often single consonants. Here, too, the frequencies—when comparing the number of words ending with one consonant to those ending with two—align with the observations in the VMS.
Here is an example of what the VMS likely actually looks like:
(Note: It's not perfect yet, but it's pretty close.)
<...> = Vocablock It is formed by the glyphs that appear in a previously space
(...) = C1 The last consonant of a word or syllable in the VMS is placed in the middle of the normal tokens
[...] = C2 The First consonant of a word or syllable in the VMS is placed in the middle of the normal tokens in
|...| = LSM / line start marker (Line start & End markes unsolved)
f3r.1 ORIGINAL:
tsheos qopal chol cthol daimg
f3r.1 SEGMENTED:
|t| <∅sh> (e) [o]<sqo>(p) [a]<lch>(o)<lcth>(o)<ld>(a) [im] <g∅>
f3r.2 ORIGINAL:
ycheor chor dam qotcham cham
f3r.2 SEGMENTED:
|y| <∅ch> (e) [o]<rch>(o)<rd>(a)<mqo>(t) [ch]<amch>(a)<m∅>
f3r.3 ORIGINAL:
ochor qocheor chol daiin cthy
f3r.3 SEGMENTED:
|o| <∅ch>(o)<rqo>(ch) [eo]<rch>(o)<ld>aiin<cth> (y∅)
f3r.4 ORIGINAL:
schey chor chal chag cham cho
f3r.4 SEGMENTIERT:
|s| (∅che)<ych>(o)<rch>(a)<lch>(a)<gch> (a)<mch>(o∅)
f3r.5 ORIGINAL:
qokol chololy s cham cthol
f3r.5 SEGMENTIERT:
|qo| <∅k>(o)<lch> (o)[lo]<lys> <ch>(a)<mcth>(o)<l∅>
This naturally gives rise to new word boundaries, which, however, are still “assumed” here.
It's also fascinating that part of the code seems to be that the vowels in “Eva” are actually consonants, and vice versa.