16-04-2026, 01:29 PM
(15-04-2026, 10:00 PM)JoJo_Jost wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The question of why "y" is one of the most frequent suffixes can only be explained by absorption – a frequency analysis would, in principle, merely have established that there is no equivalent. If one were to attempt this with "y" in Latin, it would fail, as has indeed happened often enough.
Bullshit
It fits perfectly in Latin.
I explained exactly how and why that is.
Even “daiin” = tutis, related to the Italian “tutti”

