Why and how the text could be Bavarian

[tavie]

@ Stefan

You don't need to warn me about anything, Stefan! I'm an adult, and have been for a very long time   

As far as I'm aware, the solvers on the Solution List are adults.  The latest few to get their solution added to the list, and whose solution we've extensively discussed in the last year, certainly are adults.

I haven't added you to the Solution List yet because I don't think you're completely convinced (yet) of it... but it is easy to fall over the cliff edge and hard to climb back up again.  

 I started when I noticed that the marginal notes were in Bavarian. It seemed obvious to me to test that. And from then on, this theory was increasingly confirmed... Not the other way around....

Most, I'd imagine all, on the Solution List report the same thing.  

The criticism you get here may seem annoying.  But focusing on reason why your identifications may not work is really important.  For example, you could ask yourself:

• If s = and, why is there such uneven distribution of its following glyph?  Initial so (often sol, sor)  and initial sa (usually saiin/sain) dominate.  S+o might make sense under your system ("and the"), but what's with s+a?
  
• Why is sq an invalid combination in Voynichese if it means "and + preposition"?  It only appears once, I believe.
  
• How do your glyph identifications fit with line patterns/LAAFU identified behaviour?