No text, but a visual code

[Antonio García Jiménez]

We all know how difficult it is to determine where valid spaces exist in the Voynich script. Is there a clear space between two groups of symbols, or is it simply a gap between two glyphs? In fact, this is one of the biggest problems in all transliteration systems that have been created.

  I say space between two groups of symbols because it has not been proven that they are words or that the script is a linguistic system. I also don't believe it's a cipher, much less that it's gibberish. I refuse to believe that a work that required so much effort says nothing, doesn't convey a message.

  Another fact about the script that we all know is that two groups of glyphs can be joined together or they can be separate. And that there are also single symbols.

  All these features of the script make me think that in reality each of the glyphs is a semantic unit, a unit with meaning. I've said this before, and I think the idea will gain traction in the future. For me, each glyph is an astronomical-astrological icon, given that almost half of the imagery in the codex is astrological. One might think they are something else, but in any case, glyphs are units that can stand alone or in groups because they have their own meaning, whatever it may be.