19-01-2026, 10:20 AM
That Voynich is a herbal with a great astrological influence is self-evident if we rely on what our eyes see. To say otherwise is closer to a boutade than an empirical approach to an object of knowledge. Reading what you say and what I read from you in other threads, I get the impression that we're talking about different documents, said with the utmost respect.
The biggest problem I find with Voynich research is that there are many people who add layers and layers of speculation without any real basis. The authors of the Voynich manuscript drew hundreds and hundreds of stars. It's obvious they wanted to convey something. To say that the stars are mere decoration is, to put it mildly, rather unserious.
The biggest problem I find with Voynich research is that there are many people who add layers and layers of speculation without any real basis. The authors of the Voynich manuscript drew hundreds and hundreds of stars. It's obvious they wanted to convey something. To say that the stars are mere decoration is, to put it mildly, rather unserious.

