No text, but a visual code

[Antonio García Jiménez]

To begin with, I don't hate your theories. I simply reject them because I don't find them well-founded.

You can write in this thread and refute my ideas, but please first read carefully what I think, because I don't recognize myself in the researchers who, according to you, had or have similar ideas to mine. As far as I know, no one has proposed anything similar to what I am proposing, which is perhaps why this thread is generating curiosity. To put it in today's terms: I think outside the box.

  The computational and statistical analyses that you and many others like you do have some use, but they forget something essential: that we are dealing with a medieval document made by people who thought differently from us, and therefore there is an unpredictable factor that escapes any conventional analysis.

In your view of the Voynich Manuscript, as in that of others, the images are secondary and hardly merit study. For me, however, the images are an essential part of the codex, and may even explain why the script is nothing more than a more or less ordered set of astronomical symbols.