No text, but a visual code

[Antonio García Jiménez]

I see you're an active forum member and post in almost every thread. But it's ironic that you're giving a lesson in universal linguistics in this thread titled "No text, but visual code."

  You are a prime example of the failure to find a language in the Voynich manuscript. You have been trying for almost 30 years without any success. You have certainly done a good job in analyzing the script structure, but you have not been able to reach any conclusion that is accepted by the rest of the researchers.

   I remind you that there are excellent researchers who have not seen any language, such as Timm and Schinner, or Gaskell and Bowern in their paper Gibberisch after all?...

   You'll certainly never convince me. I have a pretty clear idea of what the Voynich script is.