No text, but a visual code

[Antonio García Jiménez]

I think what I meant was misunderstood. It's not about speculating about those rare glyphs that aren't found in the main body of the script. These could be numbers or, as I believe, astrological aspects, which implies geometric relationships between celestial objects.

  What I'm saying is that we see many conventional single glyphs, which we do see throughout the script. And I wonder why those single glyphs come before or are followed by groups of glyphs, some of which are the same ones that appear as singles. I can't make any sense of it in terms of language. It's not coherent, and while medieval people had a different mindset than we do, it was still coherent.