10-12-2025, 10:14 AM
There has been debate about the circle with the sequence of glyphs repeated four times, but not about the other circles where single glyphs and single groupings of symbols alternate. And it's worth reflecting on, because that succession of singles and groups doesn't seem to make sense if you think in terms of language.
If a group of glyphs represents a word, whether in a natural or encrypted language, I wonder what the point is of finding a single glyph afterward, and then another word and another single symbol. And a succession of words followed by a succession of single symbols. Does that make any sense? Isn't it more reasonable to think of symbols full of meaning that come together or that can function on their own?
If a group of glyphs represents a word, whether in a natural or encrypted language, I wonder what the point is of finding a single glyph afterward, and then another word and another single symbol. And a succession of words followed by a succession of single symbols. Does that make any sense? Isn't it more reasonable to think of symbols full of meaning that come together or that can function on their own?