Voynich through Phonetic Irish

[Kaybo]

Should I open the other thread again?

Before I do though, I want to turn the tables for a moment, which may hopefully explain why people are asking for a more clear, concise presentation of your methods, and why the conversation is sometimes difficult.

Here is the website of Christine Preedy, who claims to have Decoded the Voynich Manuscript: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
It's a relatively new theory, still being updated, like yours. She has various pages, TikToks, videos... 

Now imagine she approaches you and asks for feedback, like many people do here on the forum.

• How long would it take you to understand what exactly she is doing? How much effort would this cost you?
  
• How likely are you to actually do that work and respond?
  
• How would you compare her theory to yours? How would you decide which one is better? I don't mean in general terms, I mean specifically her theory. What makes your theory better?
  
• We have argued endlessly with Christine, but she does not respond well to our arguments. What would you tell her to make her realize her theory cannot work?
  
• Would you still do this even if you knew beforehand that nothing you say could change her mind?
  

I'm not saying that all of those things apply equally to you, but thinking about this might give you a glimpse of the other side.

So, I'm not going to entertain this for several reasons. Neither of the threads I've created here are about this person or their theory/methodology in any way, shape or fashion. Neither thread that I created are about me comparing myself to another person or their theory and how I would confront their proposal. Why am I being asked to do this?

Are you trying to waste our time? Is this a joke or something. I mean, people can't understand what you are doing. If you can't explain your solution in a way that people can understand it, than this all is a waste of time. I can't even say if I think you theory is right or wrong, because I don't understand what you are doing and people asked you to come up with a better explanation and your just gave evasive answers.

No, I'm not trying to waste anyone's time. I came here to request volunteers to demonstrate repeatability (with me). Very simple lessons. I've found others to help with that. Now I'm on here to engage with other Voynich enthusiasts and further explore my evidence based theory.  I believe I have a solution that is clear and straightforward with clear abundant evidence on and off my thread. How I work is clear to others outside of this forum. I am not a linguist. I genuinely don't know how to precisely use or map out the linguistic fricative/guttural sound graph that was initially requested from me. I explained in my initial post I'm still learning the phonemic notation side and I was slammed with those higher level questions right off the bat.

I think your theory is either very complex and you lack the skill to explain it or it is not completely thought through, so thats why you can't explain it. You expect from the people here that they put a lot of work into understanding your theory, but they wont do that. What they want is a clear presentation they can follow, not something on youtube and some other parts here in the forum or somewhere else. I think, your main task is to put everything together. I know its a lot of work, but you need to understand that it is for other people even more work to understand what you are doing.