Should I open the other thread again?
Before I do though, I want to turn the tables for a moment, which may hopefully explain why people are asking for a more clear, concise presentation of your methods, and why the conversation is sometimes difficult.
Here is the website of Christine Preedy, who claims to have Decoded the Voynich Manuscript: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
It's a relatively new theory, still being updated, like yours. She has various pages, TikToks, videos...
Now imagine she approaches you and asks for feedback, like many people do here on the forum.
Before I do though, I want to turn the tables for a moment, which may hopefully explain why people are asking for a more clear, concise presentation of your methods, and why the conversation is sometimes difficult.
Here is the website of Christine Preedy, who claims to have Decoded the Voynich Manuscript: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
It's a relatively new theory, still being updated, like yours. She has various pages, TikToks, videos...
Now imagine she approaches you and asks for feedback, like many people do here on the forum.
- How long would it take you to understand what exactly she is doing? How much effort would this cost you?
- How likely are you to actually do that work and respond?
- How would you compare her theory to yours? How would you decide which one is better? I don't mean in general terms, I mean specifically her theory. What makes your theory better?
- We have argued endlessly with Christine, but she does not respond well to our arguments. What would you tell her to make her realize her theory cannot work?
- Would you still do this even if you knew beforehand that nothing you say could change her mind?


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)