17-11-2025, 02:04 PM
(This post was last modified: 17-11-2025, 02:39 PM by Bluetoes101.)
Ruby, it is because the method is flawed.
None of these solutions arrived at their positions by following correct reasoning based on knowledge that is available today.
We have become stuck in a "you can't reason someone out of a position they did not reason themselves into" loop here, and with all similar previous solutions.
I used Doireann's method with middle English, it produces the same level of results.
All of these solutions used the same methods on other languages and produced the same level of results.
The level is not to a standard that can be considered seriously. This is obvious by the fact several languages produce the same level of results.
What Lisa suggested (amongst other things) was to take a step back and consider "knowledge that is available today". Then we can have a solution that arrived with a proper basis.
Otherwise, we will never leave this loop and everyone here is wasting their time trying different reasoning to convince Doireann to abandon her beliefs. When you try to do this, as we have seen countless times, eventually there is a big blowout. This is because we are not dealing with reason, but belief. This is evident by this suggestion by Lisa being considered an attempt to convert, by Doireann "This was said by Lisa and it reads a bit like scientology?".
No one ever wants to accept this but if you refuse to go down the dunning kruger chart, you will never go right either.
None of these solutions arrived at their positions by following correct reasoning based on knowledge that is available today.
We have become stuck in a "you can't reason someone out of a position they did not reason themselves into" loop here, and with all similar previous solutions.
I used Doireann's method with middle English, it produces the same level of results.
All of these solutions used the same methods on other languages and produced the same level of results.
The level is not to a standard that can be considered seriously. This is obvious by the fact several languages produce the same level of results.
What Lisa suggested (amongst other things) was to take a step back and consider "knowledge that is available today". Then we can have a solution that arrived with a proper basis.
Otherwise, we will never leave this loop and everyone here is wasting their time trying different reasoning to convince Doireann to abandon her beliefs. When you try to do this, as we have seen countless times, eventually there is a big blowout. This is because we are not dealing with reason, but belief. This is evident by this suggestion by Lisa being considered an attempt to convert, by Doireann "This was said by Lisa and it reads a bit like scientology?".
No one ever wants to accept this but if you refuse to go down the dunning kruger chart, you will never go right either.


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)