Voynich through Phonetic Irish

[Doireannjane]

None of this seems important to me. The sentences translated from the Manuscript look just as incoherent with these changes.

The sentence I was asked to write in Voynich script would not exist in the script like that. Your frequesncy statistics are not even relevant. 

The sentence you were asked to write in Voynich script was to test whether your method reproduces the characteristic patterns present in the manuscript (curve-line matching, absence of certain patterns, etc). You may think these features are not important, but to me (and I suppose to many other Voynich enthusiasts) these are an essential part of the script and any solution that is not able to reproduce them is doing something wrong.

Temporality check here, if all computer/phone/quick exchange communications was erased from the planet, and a person was to find a piece of paper 100s of years into the future that read: "hai bb wyd rn" what would they make of it? Or if they saw a piece of paper with my post a few pages back that said "me rn tbh" How would they be translated? 

If a person was to find 240 pages of modern communication in English, they probably would be able to figure it out. No one ever taught me explicitly what "rn" and "tbh" mean, but somehow I was able to learn this just by reading people on the internet.

You misunderstood my question. I'm saying if there was no modern communication at all. 

Better example: Imagine there is a dialect and language that is entirely spoken, has it's own rules and phonetic spelling, one single document of it written exists and it sits amongst hundreds of academic papers in the same root language. (And that is all that exists, no other context) Would everything in that one single document be clear? Would it be hundreds of years later? Would it be hundreds of years later after a halt in natural language evolution? How do pauses or halts in language development skew a translator's or linguist's perspective?