(14-11-2025, 05:28 PM)Doireannjane wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Can you please explain all of the correct plant and root identification, that even corrects plant experts.
Plants in the MS are likely chimeric and certainly include many unrealistic details. They could be overly schematic or even imaginary, and there are more than a hundred plants in the MS, if I'm not mistaken. There are not that many possible shapes and arrangements, so it's not surprising that you have found some similarities to some real life plants. Especially if the process was the same trial and error as with tea/resin above.
(14-11-2025, 05:28 PM)Doireannjane wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.My methodology is not faulty, it is NECESSARY for this particular text given the circumstances of the history of the language it is written in and I can prove that.
If you can prove it, it would be very helpful. Otherwise the discussion seems stuck. I'm not sure about the others, but I haven't seen any good supporting arguments for your solution so far.

