21-10-2025, 12:14 PM
I wonder if our (modern) reading of "tubes" is always correct. Some pages are definitely more tuby than others. For instance, you say that the tubes seem more important on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. , but I don't even see anything on there that I'd call a tube. More like streams of water. Nobody would think of the human body when presented with these two pages in isolation, so I think this may be an overstretching of the anatomical insinuations we appear to see on some other folios.

