Could balneology section be actually gastric section?
#9
I wonder if our (modern) reading of "tubes" is always correct. Some pages are definitely more tuby than others. For instance, you say that the tubes seem more important on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. , but I don't even see anything on there that I'd call a tube. More like streams of water. Nobody would think of the human body when presented with these two pages in isolation, so I think this may be an overstretching of the anatomical insinuations we appear to see on some other folios.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Could balneology section be actually gastric section? - by Koen G - 21-10-2025, 12:14 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  In the hypothesis that the VM is a medical compendium, what is each section? Koen G 31 28,456 19-08-2026, 09:44 PM
Last Post: DG97EEB
  Three-section orbs -JKP- 96 63,616 27-07-2026, 05:34 PM
Last Post: denty
  The containers in the Pharma section ReneZ 181 162,805 26-01-2026, 01:19 AM
Last Post: Dana Scott
  Ordering large-plant bifolios in accordance with pharma section? Koen G 4 6,785 15-04-2024, 12:07 PM
Last Post: ReneZ
  Botanical section plant identification summary (work in progress) Anton 25 32,161 06-10-2021, 04:27 PM
Last Post: BGantec
  The Zodiac section: 79 (80?) human figures in the tubes. Searcher 16 18,909 12-03-2019, 12:58 AM
Last Post: Linda
  Notabilities of the Zodiac section Searcher 2 7,076 21-03-2018, 10:26 PM
Last Post: Searcher

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: