20-10-2025, 10:35 PM
Now, you've accused me of leading you in a circle, but you've made an enormous deal about how I haven't read your documentation and I don't understand your process. Now you're telling me that the paper you directed me towards to explain your process is hopelessly out of date and I cannot rely on it to understand what you're asserting. That is a serious problem for the theory as presented, and one you should probably clean up to avoid this kind of dead end in discussions about your work.
I'm not entirely ready to let that question go because I have questions about how your system evolved, so my new question is the same as the last: Even if you abandoned that part of your claim, which charts were you referring to and how can I see them for myself?
[/quote]
You asked me about that part of my paper I answered it, I told you my code has evolved, it's fully documented and you have to work upwards on Academia, that was the first paper, I can't be any clearer than that.
I'm not entirely ready to let that question go because I have questions about how your system evolved, so my new question is the same as the last: Even if you abandoned that part of your claim, which charts were you referring to and how can I see them for myself?
[/quote]
You asked me about that part of my paper I answered it, I told you my code has evolved, it's fully documented and you have to work upwards on Academia, that was the first paper, I can't be any clearer than that.