12-10-2025, 07:17 PM
It's a shame that renowned experts with extensive academic backgrounds aren't involved in Voynich research. It is somewhat surprising because this manuscript is universally known and I refuse to believe that there are not half a dozen Panofskys in the world, people who know enough about art history and iconography to formulate an informed opinion.
When interpreting the Voynich imagery, we tend to study isolated images but fail to provide a comprehensive understanding of the codex. We can't see the forest for the trees. I do have an opinion on the entire iconography. It boils down to the influence of the stars on medicinal herbs. I've been trying for some time to compare it with someone who also has a comprehensive understanding of the imagery. I may be wrong, but I need someone to prove it to me with convincing arguments.
In fact, my theory that the script is composed of astronomical symbols and groups of them that combine is based on my iconographic interpretation. The shape of the glyphs is quite revealing, but what gives meaning to this script is the message of the images.
When interpreting the Voynich imagery, we tend to study isolated images but fail to provide a comprehensive understanding of the codex. We can't see the forest for the trees. I do have an opinion on the entire iconography. It boils down to the influence of the stars on medicinal herbs. I've been trying for some time to compare it with someone who also has a comprehensive understanding of the imagery. I may be wrong, but I need someone to prove it to me with convincing arguments.
In fact, my theory that the script is composed of astronomical symbols and groups of them that combine is based on my iconographic interpretation. The shape of the glyphs is quite revealing, but what gives meaning to this script is the message of the images.

