Voynich Decoded

[Mauro]

You should reproduce my totals. If you can’t, tell me exactly where the count breaks and I’ll fix it. It’s testable.
[*]

[*]You see, Kris, you theory is testable in the sense that one can test if it is internally coherent, and I have no doubts it is. But it is not testable in the really important sense: does the VMS represents cycles and rituals as your theory says, or is it something else?

[*]It's the same situation, for instance, with Peltastri's Celtic theory: is it internally coherent? I gladly grant him it is. But does he demonstrates the VMS is a Celtic text, as opposed to, for instance, an instruction book of cycles and rituals? Think of this: let's say we are sure your theory or Peltastri's one is the right one. How can we tell which is which? Here is where testability fails.



[*]Edit: why the editor decided to insert some '[*]' baffles me.