Voynich Decoded

[Mauro]

Thank you — but I’d suggest the opposite.

What’s different in my work is that the evidence isn’t buried under assumptions. It’s counted. Structured. Testable.

I'd rather say your assumptions are counted and structured (and they are very many), that's surely true, and they form an ingenious system, but where is the 'testable' part? Ie. from your table 'daiin' = 'NOON SPIRITUS 2.5-HOURS 2.5-HOURS SUNSET'. How are you going to 'test' that? What does it ever mean, be it in linguistic or musical terms or whatever?

Remember: 'evidence' means "it's more probable under hypothesis X than under hypothesis notX", it does not mean at all "I devised a chain of assumptions which look plausible to me". The former is difficult to do, the latter not so much.

Show me where it doesn't work?

It doesn't work in the same way the recent 'solution' here: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. did not work. In both cases a long sequence of hypothesis leads to an extremely fuzzy and untestable conclusion with no evidence.